Re: question

Thanks Nathan
----- Original Message -----
From: newidder <N.E.Widder@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:51 AM
Subject: RE: question


> "The Genealogy of Ethics: Overview of a Work in Progress" in The Foucault
> Reader.  Foucault says something to the effect of: "my point is not that
> everything is bad but that everything is dangerous.  Because it is
dangerous,
> there is always something to do.  Hence my position leads not to apathy
but to
> activism."
>
> Nathan
>
>
> >===== Original Message From deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
=====
> >hello-
> >
> >I'm usually a lurker on this list.
> >
> >I have a quick reference question that I hope one you can answer.  Didn't
> Foucault write or state something like "everything is (potentially?)
> dangerous"? If so, where?
> >
> >Thanks in advance for any help.
> >M.Hampton
>
> Dr. Nathan Widder
> Lecturer in Political Theory
> University of Exeter
> Department of Politics
> Amory Building
> Rennes Drive
> Exeter  EX4 4RJ
> United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)1392 263 183
> Fax: +44 (0)1392 263 305
> http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/staff/widder/
>
>