From: ildegir sun <ildegirsun@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:31:20 +0200 (CEST)
i am answering this answer with a not "i am" not "all"
all is a word that can be slipped in a limited
environment which is, no i think the all word needs to be devlopped with as a composant of a concept, but the concept i cannot say which, i am drugged today
i am trying to come back to this very remote thinking: all unexplained beings mean nothing, it's it's limits of exploration, either it's shrinking towards the parts that limit it's presence, either the unrolling of it as a becoming space, that are full of intelligence for our purpose, to create the concept of the theory i had lost
can someone order a bit my thinkings
i had good idea on the notion off "all", but they left me, now is the task for us to find them again, this is not humor, it's a part of a poetic vision which was so beautifull, i d need to find it .
anyway if the all word is a componant of a concept, it will have to forgo other relation to other component, and lose it's pansubjectivism, it's alienation of the ego under some all sky.
the all sky is very nice, but as a component all reaches to this. i am for a miniaturization of concepts, and polyvocity with other authors preferring their usual use. but the miniaturization is my territory. in this all is a small thing, and doen't need to have such a extension . this word is in opposition to me to becoming. and still more to the constructivism of becomings, so all gets a special place, but somwhat negatively.let's finish unfinished this idea
Ny versjon av Yahoo! Messenger
Nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og dobbelt så morsom
--- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/plain (text body -- kept)