User N.E.WIDDER is not defined
Original text follows
----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 22:57:49 +0100
Received: (from domo@localhost)
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id RAA61141
for deleuze-guattari-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:04:21 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to
owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
using -f
Received: from res.lse.ac.uk (res.lse.ac.uk [158.143.96.63])
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP
id RAA64209 for <deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 17:04:14 -0400
Received: from smtplink.lse.ac.uk by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 22:04:03 +0100
Received: from ccMail
by smtplink.lse.ac.uk (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id 9705268673.AA867387517;
Thu, 26 Jun 97 21:58:37 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 21:58:37 GMT
From: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Message-Id: <9705268673.AA867387517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
Sender: owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User N.E.WIDDER is not defined
Original text follows
----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 22:02:48 +0100
Received: (from domo@localhost)
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id QAA71544
for deleuze-guattari-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:05:15 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to
owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
using -f
Received: from res.lse.ac.uk (res.lse.ac.uk [158.143.96.63])
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP
id QAA64114 for <deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:05:06 -0400
Received: from smtplink.lse.ac.uk by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 21:04:53 +0100
Received: from ccMail
by smtplink.lse.ac.uk (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id 9705268673.AA867383968;
Thu, 26 Jun 97 20:59:28 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 20:59:28 GMT
From: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Message-Id: <9705268673.AA867383968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
Sender: owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User N.E.WIDDER is not defined
Original text follows
----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 21:02:07 +0100
Received: (from domo@localhost)
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id OAA75034
for deleuze-guattari-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:34:46 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to
owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
using -f
Received: from res.lse.ac.uk (res.lse.ac.uk [158.143.96.63])
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP
id OAA78097 for <deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 14:34:36 -0400
Received: from smtplink.lse.ac.uk by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 19:34:22 +0100
Received: from ccMail
by smtplink.lse.ac.uk (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id 9705268673.AA867378550;
Thu, 26 Jun 97 19:29:10 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 19:29:10 GMT
From: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Message-Id: <9705268673.AA867378550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
Sender: owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User N.E.WIDDER is not defined
Original text follows
----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 18:46:20 +0100
Received: (from domo@localhost)
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id NAA47711
for deleuze-guattari-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 13:09:01 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to
owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
using -f
Received: from res.lse.ac.uk (res.lse.ac.uk [158.143.96.63])
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP
id NAA27480 for <deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 13:08:51 -0400
Received: from smtplink.lse.ac.uk by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 18:08:35 +0100
Received: from ccMail
by smtplink.lse.ac.uk (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id 9705268673.AA867373396;
Thu, 26 Jun 97 18:03:16 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 97 18:03:16 GMT
From: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ccMail SMTPLINK)
Message-Id: <9705268673.AA867373396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message
Sender: owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User N.E.WIDDER is not defined
Original text follows
----------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU by res.lse.ac.uk with SMTP (PP);
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 18:07:21 +0100
Received: (from domo@localhost)
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id MAA68989
for deleuze-guattari-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:24:46 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to
owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
using -f
Received: from joust.lm.com (joust.lm.com [204.171.44.18])
by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with SMTP
id MAA63863 for <deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:24:41 -0400
Received: (from tblan@localhost) by joust.lm.com (8.6.12/8.6.10) id MAA22036;
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:24:32 -0400
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:24:28 +0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Maria Blancato <tblan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: rhizomatic violence in KIBUTZ perspective
To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <32C86C9C.21EC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9706261222.C21887-0100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, Vadim Linetski wrote:
> and, btw, Tom, i've trouble with Ganhi and Tolstoy: 'cos the latter esp.
Sure, I am, too. I just mentioned that lineage, I didn't say it was
something to be wholeheartedly endorsed.
> was a sectant, i.e. a Master (have you ever read the memos of his
> followers?). if sectantism is what you are after (not sectantism, sorry,
> but the kind of non-violence sects advocate),
Well, don't jump to conclusions, though you're just saying "if" here.
ponder over the fact that
> what undermines sects is the inability to pass their non-rules of"good
> conduct" over to the next generation: when fathers are concerned,
> everything works well, but sons, educated in the "pure" atmosphere of a
> KIBUTZ, somehow do not inherit the morality, revert to old violent
> ways...
I'm not talking Kibbutz or Ashram, though it is something to look at and
think about.
why non-violence is such a short-breathed affair, why it fails
> to appeal to those who have seen nothing but care, love etc, were made
> to constantly remember violence in order to stay in non-violence?
But is that really true? Are sects really so nonviolent? Aren't they , on
the contrary, often very violent?
> your violent vadim
>
You rascal, you!
Re's
TMB
