thks for link to transactional interpretation. There seems to be many.
Anyone familiar with objective tendencies coming from Heisenberg? Sound
like virtual tendencies in Deleuze. In any case how do you, d&g list,
interpret virtual tendencies?
inna
On Mon, 26 Oct 1998, Mark Crosby wrote:
> Greg Seigworth cited Deleuze's _Bergsonism_ about
> how "at each instant duration divides into two
> simultaneous tendencies, one which goes toward the
> future and the other falls back into the past" and
> Inna Runova Semetsky wrote: "I wonder if someone is
> thinking of looking into it from the viewpoint of the
> light cone in physics?"
>
> I don't know enough physics to say much more than
> this, but what Deleuze describes there sounds very
> much like the 'transactional interpretation' of
> quantum mechanics.
>
> This theory was developed by physicist John G. Cramer
> who also writes the "Alternate View" column for the
> _Analog_ SF magazine. See
>
http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/av_index_sub.html
>
> A friend once wrote about Cramer's model: "I like it
> because it ties past, present and future together in
> a vast web of handshaking, a sort of spacetime
> geodesic dome..."
>
> - Mark
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>