The (now should be) unmentionable has nonetheless been. "Role" no
longer has any place, neither here-now (post-Freudian) nor there-
then (even many if not most pre's should bar such conceptual late
comers or after-the-fact word-insertions). So, reinterpreting, it
is a 'mask upon masks'. Again, "resonate" must follow somewhat in
a similar way, as 'echo an echo in return'. Now to something more
than words, terms. A confusion (to be multiplied) on my part. How
is it that a woman is more likely to be an empty BwO? Or is it in
one particular kind? I sense it is only a matter of difficulty, a
choice on some level, that any mask is removed (variables include
time space intensity risk). Which of the following two is closer,
intentionally and/or actually, to an empty BwO? 1) One that is so
passive that it always is affected by waves (of all sorts) moving
with or without regard to affecting this one specifically so that
this one seems (by not referring to it directly or internally) to
be so active; and 2) one that is so active in order to counteract
the waves with inverse waves of its own so that it seems (same as
above) to be so passive that seems permanent and substantial. But
there may be a remedy to be suggested by the logic of interiority
and exteriority when it comes to any BwO. I will let that part to
try to flesh itself out. The "distance" mentioned by me has to do
with between two from the perspective of a third. The two may not
perceive a "distance" in the same measure or configuration as the
third or perhaps no "distance" at all. (It has been a while since
attentively read much Nietzsche, too many others to read, and too
little time to properly navigate thoughts to him and 'live'.) And
about metaphors whether they be "wrapped around the non-origin of
origin" or not (whatever the latter could be if at all possible),
they too must undergo a metamorphosis in thought as "role" above.
I will leave that for now. Yet, I should 'flatly' make my opinion
clear I think politics is-to-be-done-with, sensing any conspiracy
between this mess of history and Platonic/Other World to be worse
than it at any time appears. An ultimate cynicism? No, that would
require a shared value (system) though only in some defeated form
or defeating manner. My stance in ethics may be a polar opposite,
but is still in its infancy, about two years since a turning. So,
I will let your voice take charge of this part's navigation. Now,
one last point to be covered here (so little is ever revealed). A
language completely flat should have nothing "abstract". The game
is equal. What is unequal, that which has authority, is so within
a disparity of two semi-exclusive parts of a language, or one may
say two languages (but that may lead to radical relativism, which
seems to be inappropriate when seen in a philosophy of difference
in that, perhaps for Deleuze and at least my revision of Levinas,
but this is better left for a whole other time). I will look more
closely how this affects abstract machines. There-then, over now.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at
http://www.hotmail.com
