A/SCIENCE II

____________________________________________________________________________
                       C o m m e n t a r i e s  .2

                               *  *  *

       Here the market is understood as a technology of process, formerly
  informed by craft, now by science.  It thus becomes obvious why the law
  in its service to the market must accept efficiency.

       The state is necessarily limitless taking its agenda, as it does,
  from science which itself knows no limits.  The form of the state is
  recepticular; it names only the containment of actions, which are
  exhausting.  The power of the state resides in its capacity for action
  which is sustained by science.  The condition of the state is the state
  of science, as it once was the state of God.

       Democratic institutions may exist, but are no longer political,
  being structural instead, and a consideration of efficiency.  The polity
  like the market is seen as a technological endeavor.

       Power accrues rapidly in the state but diffusely, tending not to
  aggregate easily, because of the extensive nature of the science in which
  it is vested.

                                   *  *  *

       The accomplishments of recent political movements are not anomalous.
  The environmentalists were almost animist and deficient in theory.  Their
  antique idols were simply mounted down by the state and recast as science
  and utility and such was the nature of their victory.  The rights move-
  ments have eroded the former heirarchies based on sex, class, age, race
  and culture, but the hierarchies of science and state have been the
  implicit beneficiaries of the displaced power.

                                   *  *  *

       This description is an attempt to take stock of the relationship
  between science and state.  By its nature it is unacceptable in the terms
  of the state it seeks to describe.  Apostasy is so.

       Its politics are in its language and in the power of naming.
  Science is the orthodoxy, but it is largely quiet on the question
  of itself.  In a world of artifice, science is the central feature.
  But how shall we know it, then if not in terms of itself?

                                   *  *  *

       In a world of imminent and impending artifice, the question of
  the state must be reopened.

                                   *  *  *