Re: architecture can't die

Responding to Nic's post:
wow, I tremble at the presence of one of the anointed.  An honest to goodness
CU apparatchik!  Look, John, isn't he irate and defensive about your lack of
legitimacy and (gasp) naked desire for fame and media stroking?  I don't
really understand what he is talking about (then again, the whole
semiotext/architecture book confused me too.

sp: It never ceases to amaze me how many aspiring critiques of
contemporary architectural theory are lurking in the folds of the net.
Further, it is even more amazing, yet sadly nothing but cynical, that these
vipers believe themselves to be situated OUTSIDE the productions of
desire they so easily, with so little engagement, outright condemn. They
have only to awaken to their own (self motivated) groundlessness, and
from this non-personage/position realize that those they shoot for/target,
exist only as their own self-constructed media phantasms and as such are
more a reflection of themselves.