Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ Design-L.V1 ]
(static) Archive of Design-L, 03-1992 to 11-2004
Design-L activity continued at... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
 

Re: 365 Subscribers Exist On Design-l Today.


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 04919…

 
+  From: Stephen Perrella <sp43@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 15:36:55 -0500
to david and rma,

to the extent to which i may have instigated a concern for the names on
this list, i would like to politely intervene in the following
forming-skirmish):
s. ducher writes:
Dear rma:

Do I detect some use of the term 'hung up' as a pejorative?
Did not my phrasing evince a certain degree of sympathy for persons (such
as yourself?) who prefer to make slightly snide remarks without
identifying themselves?
When your question is phrased in a less conclusory manner (e.g. 'why do
you think identity of members of a list is important?') it will deserve an
answer.

David Sucher

sp: David, i am glad you caught on to the concern to have access to the
names, however, my concerns are not finally, about identity and i think
rma might think that on the net, identity is not finally possible. I
petitioned Howard the list owner for the names and he said no. He may be
concerned about the property value of the list. (cyber-estate) and that
is understandable. I had two reasons: one to go after more "identities"
(whoever they might be) to pitch into the forum. The other was to invoke
this net-medium-forum to excercise the radical deomoctratization implicit
in having over 300 people interconnected equivically. The list might be a
complete mess if all voiced simultaneously, but what the hell, let's try
it anyway. And further, being a part of the one-way media has become very
frustrating for me. This list has the potential for a very rich
discussion that often times is covered over by proprietary concerns, ones
that i deeply desire to trangress.

to rma: wasn't david's concern TOO easy of a target? ;)

//////////////////////////////////////////////Stephen Perrella, Architect//
//////........./////////////////////////////////////////sp43@xxxxxxxxxxxx////
/////....... *//////////////////////////////////////////////403 Avery Hall//
////... >///////////////////////////////Columbia Univ.New York 10027//
///... =" Language is the house of Being/Televisual"///////////////////
////// //////////studio AEM/NYC/architecture at the end of metaphysics///
////////////////// ofc: 212-854-5885 //////// fax: 212-864-0410 ///////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Previous by Thread: Re: 365 Subscribers Exist On Design-l Today.
Next by Thread: Re: 365 Subscribers Exist On Design-l Today.
 
Partial thread listing: