+
From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 13:58:32 -0500
Wall Street Journal, March 1, 1996, p. B10.
Local Architects Set Their Cities' Style
By Alexandra Peers
[Photos] Southern California style by Michael C.F. Chan.
A Barry Sugerman design in the Miami area. Frederic
Schwartz's look for the Hamptons.
Who is Bill Poss and can he add a 10% premium to the value
of your home?
In the stratosphere right below Frank Lloyd Wright, Richard
Meier, Michael Graves and Frank Gehry are a host of
architects well-known in their own regions and in their
field but not yet, if ever to be, household names.
Whether known for their abilities to create the distinctly
Vail mountain chalet, the Chicago townhouse that aims to
feel like a ranch home or the opulent Los Angeles
residence, there are architects in every major city whose
names real-estate brokers trumpet in ads as a selling point
when a house hits the market. They are the architects local
home-builders wrangle to work with on a "signature" home.
And they are who buyers pick when they want more input in
their dream house than they think a superstar might give
them.
Consider Mr. Poss, an architect who has designed about 80
homes, mostly in Colorado. "We don't have a distinctive
style like a Robert Stern or a Richard Meier," says Mr.
Poss, "You can pick out their homes." He adds, "Our homes
don't beat their chests" with design. Nonetheless, Aspen
real-estate broker Sandye Whitaker says Mr. Poss
"understands the Colorado lifestyle. His homes are elegant
yet cozy and that's really hard to do." The Poss name,
"adds value out here," she says.
For most Americans, an architect is a rare luxury. Fewer
than 2% of homeowners build a custom-made dream house
instead of buying older homes or selecting from a
real-estate developer's or home builder's menu. The cost of
an architect for a custom-made home averages about 10% to
15% of the total project's costs. But some brokers say
that, if the architect is enough of a local celebrity, that
cost is recoverable. Betsy Losh, a broker at Seattle's
Ewing & Clark, says "a good architect is going to get you
a little bit more money-and a quicker sale."
But beware. Architecture has elements of both art and
fashion, and there's often stunningly little agreement on
what is a great house among the architects who design them,
the home builders who construct them and the real-estate
brokers who may later have to sell them. "What is great
architecture doesn't particularly sell well," notes Carolyn
Miller of Wimbish-Riteway Realty in Miami. An architect's
signature masterpiece may prove too modern, too customized
or too imposing to be a livable home.
Moreover, architectural styles can go out of fashion, or be
copied (often badly). The exterior steel staircases and
boxy white-block design of many California and Miami
buildings may someday make a New England saltbox house look
like a simple masterpiece. Driving around the West, "there
are all these postmodern houses [from the early '80s] with
little square windows and Michael Graves-like details on
everything and you just shudder," says Aspen home builder
Steve Hansen. A buyer doesn't want a house that you can
look at and say "Oh, that was built in the '70s."
Right now, in architecture, "there are little camps all
over the place, there's no single aesthetic that's taking
over," says Deborah Gimelson, a broker with New York's
Orsid Realty. While architects have become local and
national celebrities, not all add resale value. "To be a
selling point, the architect has to have proven him or
herself," to call up a particular style to mind when the
name is mentioned, at least in that region of the country,
Ms. Gimelson says. "If you say John Doe and only four
people in New York know who that is, who cares?"
Miami architect Barry Sugerman may not be a household name.
But he won "Home of the Year" in the Best in American
Living Awards given out three years ago by the National
Association of Home Builders for his white, modern
three-bedroom, 4,220-square-foot home priced at $625,000.
In New York's Hamptons, a name that carries cachet is
Frederic Schwartz of Anderson/Schwartz Architects. A former
associate of influential alchitect Robert Venturi, Mr.
Schwartz has had a home featured on the cover of House
Beautiful magazine. Mr Schwartz is currently working on a
pet project: a low-cost $199,000 home in trendy East
Hampton, N.Y. "In the Hamptons, it's easy to build a $1
million or $500,000 house," he says, but it was a challenge
to build a 1,800-square-foot home for under $100 a square
foot. (Other work, including the pool, site preparation and
iandscaping are pushing the cost of the project slightly
above that figure.)
In Seattle, architect Stuart Silk has been dubbed by the
Seattle Times the city's "best-known young architect" and
his homes have been featured in Metropolitan Home and
Progressive Architecture. Mr. Silk's homes, which mix
modern design with traditional materials, studiously
avoiding the "woodsy" look of most Northwest architecture,
are "very, very hot," says Mrs. Losh.
In Chicago, one of the name architects is Larry Booth, who
is also featured this month in Architectural Digest
magazine. "There's a very Chicago flavor about him," says
Koenig & Strey broker Nancy Joyce. The foyers are big
enough to greet guests, there are airy kitchens, a family
room, sometimes French doors, she says. The homes have "a
stamp of livability."
Even when building a customized dream house, it's
resalability is key, because the average American moves
every four to five years, warns Los Angeles architect
Michael C.F. Chan, who designed tennis star John McEnroe's
Malibu beach home. Architecture is often "like a product --
people just like to buy a brand name, like fashion, like
Norma Kamali -- so they know what the project will look
like." But buyers also have to look for an architect who
will give them input. "It's the architect's job to provide
a product that the average lifestyle "will fit into."
Los Angeles philanthropist Iris Cantor, along with her
husband, financier B. Gerald Cantor, have their own
sculpture garden in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art,
and probably could have had any architect they wanted for
their large Louis XVI-style home currently under
construction. But they wanted a collaborator.
"You see some famous people's houses and you look and you
know who did that. You can look and say this is a Frank
Gehry building, this is a this, this is a that," says Mrs.
Cantor. But "we wanted beautifully proportioned spaces and
a wonderful staircase and a wonderful place in harmony with
our art." The couple owns a major art collection of
sculpture, 19th-century paintings and German Expressionist
works. They chose Mr. Chan as their architect-for the
second time-because "he's not a person who dismisses you."
"Some architects let design get in the way of pleasing a
client's functional wishes," says Mr. Poss. But, he adds,
it is not always a prima donna architect who's the problem;
people often don't know what they want or don't know that
the architect knows better. "They want a contemporary home
but they also want a rustic home."
Says Mr. Chan, "Clients come to us in their 30s, and they
want to do a very, very modern home and we have to tell
them" they may tire of a house with no historic elements.
Fashionable houses aren't always the architects' fault; the
demands of homeowners also are faddish. In the late 1980s,
every new homeowner wanted huge, unusual window treatments
or skylights. Now, security and maintenance concerns have
made that yesterday's trend.
What are people asking for now? Says Mr. Poss: "More
creature comforts, larger entertainment spaces, a billiards
room or theater room and bigger [vacation] homes for
extended families." Architects say that other details in
demand are built-in niches for televisions, sculptures, or
knickknacks; home offices; media rooms; and breakfast
nooks. Says Mr. Booth, "I ask [clients] where do you want
to eat breakfast and what do you want to look at?"
[End]