^ Architexturez Mail-Lists Home

 

Re: research as design-talk?

switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 13476…

 
+  From: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:25:56 -0400
Diablist Lauf brimstoned:

> a third slim marginal side that is circular and perpendicular to
>both of the others.

Heed, file and praise this sulphurine. For it IDs the creative
alternative to fear-of-god-undergirded knowledge-architecture
of rightness and wrongness, salvation from sin.

Reason gets it equally right and wrong, which is why it's
so blind faithedly embraced.

Logos, ugh, preaching good to the bad; illogos, now you talking
bad back at the pulpit, and what's bad for the Superego is good
for the Id.

Skipping personal hygiene is a misstep, too, with ungrammaticalilty
a sign of advanced waywardness.

What else happened at the Penn digital stinkup besides sinners
preaching dont do as I have?

Zaha garbling at Charlie eartier this week, a towering babble, eh?
Was her personal assistant just off camera? Or was that
Mephistophiles she helplessly looked to for translation Rose
could grasp?

Is it true that the entire creme de la creme will be bioweaponed
at Four Seasons' 40th anniver, the obelisk noir then imploded?
 
Previous by Thread: Re: research as design-talk?
Next by Thread: Re: research as design-talk?
 
Partial thread listing: