Re: Architecture Profession.

two excerpts
>From: bc <human@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: DESIGN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Architecture Profession.
>Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2001, 2:45 PM


>how can they take on the world, say, if they have the complexity of
>making another primitive hut for the dark ages of technological society?

Are you (secretly) searching for a (non-tragic) Hero?  One with
unchastened pride AND intellectual peace?

>"___________" does not exist. without essence. or
>if it does, its essence is not that bandied about in circular jerking of
>adminstrations of .edu
>peversions. institutions run people, is that not clearer than daylight?
>no.  it is night, and artifice, well, it is irrelevant for it is 'sacred
>blight' to the true believing, make perceiving, that is the
>professionalization of deceit.

institutus, past participle of instituere
<in-, in , on, +statuere, to cause to stand, set up, place>

my--of, belonging to, or done by me
our--of, belonging to, or done by us
its--of, belonging to, or done by it

MY is not enough.  OUR/ITS is perverted.
You dismiss the individual, the small, mocking their simplicity.
The group you fix as perverted, dominated/dominative.
Neither measures up to some lilting, pure, standard set to
bring the world to rights.

Brain, how do you allow for movement in this trap you've set?
What ACT, what SIGN would signal to you the world is
moving toward paradise not squandered, ready at the right
time, each soul, to die in beauty?

//Van

.