Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ Design-L.V1 ]
(static) Archive of Design-L, 03-1992 to 11-2004
Design-L activity continued at... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
 

pointers


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 20177…

 
+  From: patachon <tercasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:42:48 -0500
In Durand's _Recueil et parallèle des édifices de tout genre, anciens &
modernes, remarquables par leur beauté, par leur grandeur ou par leur
singularité_, 1800, where a 'history' of architecture is presented via plans
and elevations all drawn at the same scale and categorized by type (ie,
temples, churches, palaces, theaters, etc.), the only building/structure
larger than St. Peter's Basilica is the Great Pyramid of Giza--the Great
Pyramid originally reached a height of 480 ft.; St. Peter's reaches 452 ft.;
the U.S Capitol reaches 287.5 ft. From this 'record', it is likely safe to
say that St. Peter's is the largest hollow stone/masonry building.

ok. Thanks.
Where are the Bourges, Koln and Nevers cathedral listed in this Durand
Recueil ?

what about more "modern" buildings / structures? ( The Koln cathedral was
finished after 1800 I think)

are some industrial or skyscrapers included in some other relation
available ?
not only for their height but also the ground surface they re-cover ?
(supposing we refer here to one continuous volume, hollow constructions, not
the WTC , but eventually the Lourdes relatively underground cathedral ,
f.i.)

When I compared the profiles of St. Peter's and the Pyramid(s), it was more
just the notion of both examples having a broad base that progressively
reaches a single point at a great height.

with diferent schemes / ways / of "pointing" to their respective heavens.
is the notion of "pointing to the sky" a necessity in the architect
/designer concept or just a structural , physical solution to enhance
resistance ? or the two ?

probably the gizeh pyramids are pointed because constructed with the
obligation to use obliques with one point of fusion at the top, and the St
Peter cathedral use rounded blossoms as coupoles... with one added symbol
like a cross.
Could there be also a kind of Macho/sexist-like concept in some very
"pointed" buildings ? in the minarets of Santa Sofia in Istanbul and the
towers of the London Towers or bridge ?

So then how would we define the "inspiration" , if any, of those flat roofed
buildings like the wtc?

saludos
¼at




--



 
Previous by Thread: POINTER-->arts.activism conference
Next by Thread: Re: pointers
 
Partial thread listing: