Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ Design-L.V1 ]
(static) Archive of Design-L, 03-1992 to 11-2004
Design-L activity continued at... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
 

Re: censoring the sensors ???


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 21268…

 
+  From: arthur elzy <arthurelzy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:46:12 +0000
perhaps this is useful:

"Perception is real even when it is not reality."
Edward De Bono

From: patachon <tercasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Basic and applied design (Art and Architecture)"
<DESIGN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: DESIGN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: censoring the sensors ???
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:49:35 -0600



I prefer what the eye really does see as opposed to photography where what
is 'unsightly' is omitted.

disagree !!!
there is no opposition or contradiction between photography and eye vision,
on the contrary. a complementarity, generally speaking. some enhancement. a
kind of tricky bzness

As you wrote, certainly the "unseen" in a pict can sometimes be necessary
to
understand better some situation,
but the same could be said about what you have in your visual field when
reading this post. seeing your screen you can't see something elsewhere,
out of that precise field of perception.
Do you (we) need the unseen to understand what you (we) see ? (It could
become a religious matter , there !)

in some picts you feel or sense there are unseen objects related to the
showed result.
(take, as a fast example, a car crash where a tree not "seen" is printed
into the windshield)
(reproduced or in-pressed in the steel debris as kind of gigantic typo
lettering)

if we have two eyes focusing, generally, in front of us, the two sensors
can't see backwards if you don't turn your head backwards too , so the
unsight will always be next, or there, (to be eventually pictured later,
if the roll isn't finished or the battery is still charged).

but let's keep talking on about what the human/animal eyes really do see,
or
the snakes feel with their infrared sensors or the bats with some
ultrasounds... and fish with their lateral chain of echolocators/sensors...
or Hubble telescope with gamma sensors or X-Ray magnetometry or the
like.......

living creatures can feel without sensing. (feel pretty, sorry or
crazy...)(
but then from their inside)
but senses need external feeling.
a perception.

bromure need the same to be blackening the silver in a gelatin base.
just some photonic energy.

Pat



--
The Design-L list for art and architecture, since 1992...
To subscribe, send mailto:design-l-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To signoff, send mailto:design-l-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Visit archives: http://lists.psu.edu/archives/design-l.html

_________________________________________________________________
Store more e-mails with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage ? 4 plans to choose from!
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/

--
The Design-L list for art and architecture, since 1992...
To subscribe, send mailto:design-l-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To signoff, send mailto:design-l-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Visit archives: http://lists.psu.edu/archives/design-l.html
 
Previous by Thread: censoring the sensors ???
Next by Thread: FW: Census 2000: racial segregation
 
Partial thread listing: