Re: _ + _ = _

+ From: patachon <tercasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 03:17:34 -0500

>>>> about purity in basics, could you imagine how to demonstate that 1
>>>> more 1 is 2 ?
>
>
> here is another possibility:
>
> 1 = _ (length)
>
> __ = 2 (2 lengths of 1)
>
>
will have to look for, and eventually translate an old pure arithmetics
book...

a lenghty affair !
keep on the theme

:-)

Pat

--
The Design-L list for art and architecture, since 1992...
To subscribe, send mailto:design-l-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To signoff, send mailto:design-l-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Visit archives: http://lists.psu.edu/archives/design-l.html

+ Previous by Thread: _ + _ = __
+ Next by Thread: :)

Partial thread listing:

Re: _ + _ = __, (continued…)

Re: _ + _ = __, patachon

:), Fernando Almeida
..., brian carroll (2004-04-02)

<Possible follow-up(s)>

..., brian carroll

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\, scott paterson