+
From: "michaelP" <pennamacoor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:29:52 +0100
> THIS MESSAGE IS IN MIME FORMAT. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--MS_Mac_OE_3106733392_1518193_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
namely: that a being has to be; the implacable restlessness of things;
driven/driving, having to be; beings imbricated in beings; in humanbeing's
case, not just being alive (although this is necessary in the case of living
beings to be what and how they are...), but all ways have-ing to be a
being... de-ciding, re-sponding, re-acting, even re-posing, in order: to
just be
"To be, not dead, yet no longer alive? As a ghostlike, silent, gazing,
gliding, hovering daimon?" [Nietzsche, 'The Gay Science']
(Nietzsche's gliding silent sailing ship (of life, of being?))
rene recently:
"...all efforts to overcome subjectivity, [...] are merely innocent play."
In my innocent, inner-scenting play, I have a pre-verbal sense and
understanding of my having to be -- I cannot avoid this life sentence; even
hurling myself headlong into the void does not a-void this sentence. My
question:
In its own stony way, does, say, a stone lying on the ground, have to be [a
stone lying on the ground]? If so, what does this mean with regard to its
way of be-ing?
Heidegger says:
"... factical life lives the world as the in-which, upon-which, and
for-which of life." [in 'Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle']
Human being is free-falling and always-crashing, "in the middle of nowhere";
how about other beings? Being: falling/crashing/having-to-be?
regards
michael Peine a ma coeur
--MS_Mac_OE_3106733392_1518193_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>something's gotten hold of my heart </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#00FFFF">
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">namely: that a being has to be; the implacable restle=
ssness of things; <BR>
driven/driving, having to be; beings imbricated in beings; in humanbeing's<=
BR>
case, not just being alive (although this is necessary in the case of livin=
g<BR>
beings to be what and how they are...), but all ways have-ing to be a<BR>
being... de-ciding, re-sponding, re-acting, even re-posing, in order: to<BR=
>
just be<BR>
</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#FF0000">"To be, not dead, yet no longer alive? As a ghos=
tlike, silent, gazing,<BR>
gliding, hovering daimon?" [Nietzsche, 'The Gay Science']<BR>
</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">(Nietzsche's gliding silent sailing ship (of life, of=
being?))<BR>
<BR>
rene recently:<BR>
</FONT><BR>
"...all efforts to overcome subjectivity, [...] are merely innocent pl=
ay."<BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">In my innocent, inner-scenting play, I have a pre-ver=
bal sense and<BR>
understanding of my having to be -- I cannot avoid this life sentence; even=
<BR>
hurling myself headlong into the void does not a-void this sentence. My<BR>
question:<BR>
<BR>
In its own stony way, does, say, a stone lying on the ground, have to be [a=
<BR>
stone lying on the ground]? If so, what does this mean with regard to its<B=
R>
way of be-ing?<BR>
<BR>
Heidegger says:<BR>
</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#FF0000">"... factical life lives the world as the in-whi=
ch, upon-which, and<BR>
for-which of life." [in 'Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle=
']<BR>
</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">Human being is free-falling and always-crashing, &quo=
t;in the middle of nowhere";<BR>
how about other beings? Being: falling/crashing/having-to-be?<BR>
<BR>
regards<BR>
</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#FF0000">michael Peine a ma coeur<BR>
</FONT><BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--MS_Mac_OE_3106733392_1518193_MIME_Part--
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
