+
From: "michaelP" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 15:23:58 +0000
> THIS MESSAGE IS IN MIME FORMAT. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--MS_Mac_OE_3127562638_1940830_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
mP:
>> (however opposed in their ontic views,
>> neither having anything to say, ontologically)
Tudor:
> I'm amused! :-) So, either one says something which agrees to Heidegger, or
> he should be banned from this list.
Who said anything about being banned from the list: I have never suggested
nor ever will suggest or want such a thing. And it is not a matter of
parotting or aping Heidegger or agreeing with him at all that constitutes
having something ontological to say; nothing of the sort. It's just that
neither of you, IMHO, so far has said anything that genuinely seeks being,
despite the enormous difficulties that incurs. Neither do I think I have,
but I have endeavoured to struggle with it (embarrassing at times, utterly
up the creek at others, etc), without belief or disbelief.
Still trying, but you two are so so full of yourselves, philosophically, I
cannot and no longer want to engage with such forces. Please carry on.
Without me.
regards
mP
--MS_Mac_OE_3127562638_1940830_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: smothering flutterbyes and judorberries</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#00FFFF">
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">mP:<BR>
>> (however opposed in their ontic views,<BR>
>> neither having anything to say, ontologically)<BR>
</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">Tudor:<BR>
</FONT>> I'm amused! :-) So, either one says something which agrees to H=
eidegger, or<BR>
> he should be banned from this list.<BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">Who said anything about being banned from the list: I=
have never suggested<BR>
nor ever will suggest or want such a thing. And it is not a matter of<BR>
parotting or aping Heidegger or agreeing with him at all that constitutes<B=
R>
having something ontological to say; nothing of the sort. It's just that<BR=
>
neither of you, IMHO, so far has said anything that genuinely seeks being,<=
BR>
despite the enormous difficulties that incurs. Neither do I think I have,<B=
R>
but I have endeavoured to struggle with it (embarrassing at times, utterly<=
BR>
up the creek at others, etc), without belief or disbelief.<BR>
<BR>
Still trying, but you two are so so full of yourselves, philosophically, I<=
BR>
cannot and no longer want to engage with such forces. Please carry on.<BR>
Without me.<BR>
<BR>
regards<BR>
<BR>
mP<BR>
</FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--MS_Mac_OE_3127562638_1940830_MIME_Part--
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
