Re: why meat?

+ From: GEVANS613@xxxxxxx
+ Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:43:52 EDT

--part1_145.10628733.2be1aba8_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 30/04/2003 21:11:37 GMT Daylight Time,
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> Subj:Re: why meat?
> Date:30/04/2003 21:11:37 GMT Daylight Time
> From: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (michaelP)
> Sender: owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
> To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> Jud the meat:
>
> >> > Meat questions because it is a questioning meat, and not a
>> non-questioning
>> > meat.
>>
>
> why? why questions if just meat? what purpose, meatwise, purely meatwise,
> does questioning serve for meat-qua-meat?

Jud:
Why is human meat (for it is of course human meat that is characterised as a
questioning meat) questioning rather than a non-questioning meat? That seems
to be the pivotal thrust of your message below, which is fugue-like in its
insistent interpellating peckings and repetitive forms and thematic
ingeminates both above and below the pentad stave of its first statement.
This is no criticism for, the questioning of questioning meat is the most
amazing phenomena of the universe as we know it, and is far more exciting as
a question to excogotate than the possibility of the existence of some
irritable desert God who hides in burning bushes and speaks privately on
mountaintops.
As I write this I am reminded of a scene from the famous Speilberg/Arthur.C
Clarke [he who wrote it] movie, with the background music of Thus Spake
Zarathrustra [I think] with the man-apes throwing the rib-bones tools/weapons
in the air, which due to the brilliance of the American special effects team
was transformed into a space station encircling the earth. Why did the meaty
man-ape take the bone from the floor where it had lain whitening for years
and raise it above its meaty head to bring it crashing down first on the
other bones to extract the marrow and then on the head of an aggressor to
drive him away from his females?
The answer in my ever so humble opinion was so that he could be left in peace
to shag the females and that the limited food supplies would be available to
his troop so that he and the others and the impregnated mothers would survive
to ensure that his DNA would survive and multiply and repeat itself down the
millennia like one of Michael's interpellating fugues.

Meat begets meat, and which meat begat which, and whose meat begot is a
very carnal story where Parkanyesque matriarchs and pathetically posturing
puerile Parkanyesque pappas played procurationally together as the bible
reminds us constantly, with its genealogical mantras of the family histories
of horny old patriarchs plugging and pleasuring their paternal peni with
passionate phaneromania.

Interval: "Music Maestro!
The Straussean Waltz [an early and far more decorous forerunner of
postmodernist rap] goes something like this.:

Sing along to the tune of: Dah dah dah - dah-da dah-da - dah da - dah-da etc,

1) Why did he pick up the bone? - To beat off rivals.
Why beat off rivals? - to achieve sexual dominance.
Why desire sexual dominance? To ensure genetic immortality.
Why desire genetic immortality? Because I wish to live forever.
Why want to live forever? Because...er... nature wants me to
Why does nature want you to live forever? Er...don't know...Michael...help...?

Over to you Michael for your non-meaty opinion.

Cheers,

Jud.

<A HREF="http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/ ">http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/</A>
Jud Evans - ANALYTICAL INDICANT THEORY.
<A HREF="http://uncouplingthecopula.freewebspace.com";>http://uncouplingthecopula.freewebspace.com</A>

--part1_145.10628733.2be1aba8_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>In a message dated 30/04/=
2003 21:11:37 GMT Daylight Time, michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
 
 
 <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-=
LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:Re: why meat?
 Date:30/04/2003 21:11:37 GMT Daylight Time
 From:    michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (michaelP)
 Sender:    owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Reply-to: <A HREF=3D"mailto:heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>heideg=
ger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>
 To:    heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
 Jud the meat:
 
 <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-=
LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">> Meat qu=
estions because it is a questioning meat, and not a  non-questioning=20
 > meat.=20
 </BLOCKQUOTE>
 
 why? why questions if just meat? what purpose, meatwise, purely meatwise=
, does questioning serve for meat-qua-meat? </BLOCKQUOTE>
 
 Jud:
 Why is human meat (for it is of course human meat that is ch=
aracterised as a questioning meat) questioning rather than a non-questioning=
meat? That seems to be the pivotal thrust of your message below, which is f=
ugue-like in its insistent interpellating peckings and  repetitive form=
s and thematic ingeminates both  above and below the pentad stave of &n=
bsp;its first statement.  This is no criticism for, the questioning of=20=
questioning meat is the most amazing phenomena of the universe as we know it=
, and is far more exciting as a question to excogotate than the possibility=20=
of the existence of some irritable desert God who hides in burning bushes an=
d speaks privately on mountaintops.
 As I write this I am reminded of a scene from the famous Speilberg/Arthu=
r.C Clarke [he who wrote it]  movie, with the background music of Th=
us Spake Zarathrustra [I think] with the man-apes throwing the rib-bones=
tools/weapons in the air, which due to  the brilliance of the American=
special effects team was transformed into a space station encircling the ea=
rth. Why did the meaty man-ape take the bone from the floor where it had lai=
n whitening for years and raise it above its meaty head to bring it crashing=
down first on the other bones to extract the marrow and then on the head of=
an aggressor to drive him away from his females?
 The answer in my ever so humble opinion was so that he could be left in=20=
peace to shag the females and that the limited food supplies would be availa=
ble to his troop so that he and the others and the impregnated mothers would=
survive to ensure that his DNA would survive and multiply and repeat itself=
down the millennia like one of Michael's interpellating fugues.
 
 Meat begets meat, and  which meat begat  which, and whose meat=
begot  is a very carnal story where Parkanyesque matriarchs and pathet=
ically posturing puerile  Parkanyesque pappas played procurationally to=
gether as the bible reminds us constantly, with its genealogical mantras of=20=
the family histories of horny old  patriarchs plugging and pleasuring t=
heir paternal peni with passionate phaneromania.
 
 Interval: "Music Maestro!
 The  Straussean Waltz [an early and far more decorous forerunner=
of postmodernist rap] goes something like this.:
 
 Sing along to the tune of: Dah dah dah - dah-da dah-da - dah da - dah-da=
etc,
 
 1) Why did he pick up the bone? - To beat off rivals.
 Why beat off rivals? - to achieve sexual dominance.
 Why desire sexual dominance? To ensure genetic immortality.
 Why desire genetic immortality?  Because I wish to live forever.
 Why want to live forever? Because...er... nature wants me to
 Why does nature want you to live forever? Er...don't know...Michael...he=
lp...?
 
 Over to you Michael for your non-meaty opinion.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Jud.
 
 <A HREF=3D"http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/ ">http://evans=
-experientialism.freewebspace.com/</A>=20
 Jud Evans - ANALYTICAL INDICANT THEORY.
 <A HREF=3D"http://uncouplingthecopula.freewebspace.com";>http://uncouplin=
gthecopula.freewebspace.com</A></HTML>

--part1_145.10628733.2be1aba8_boundary--

--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

+ Previous by Thread: Re: why meat?
+ Next by Thread: RE: Why MH Teaches

Partial thread listing:

Re: why meat?, (continued…)

Re: why meat?, GEVANS613

RE: Why MH Teaches, jstratton (1997-02-11)

<Possible follow-up(s)>

RE: Why MH Teaches, allen scult

RE: Why MH Teaches, allen scult

Why MH Teaches, jstratton

<< Thread Prev < Date Prev…	^ date index+…	^ thread index+…	…Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 09950…