On the more substantive point, as I said to Rene this is an approach to a
question rather than the topic in itself. But if I'm the pussy-in-the-middle to
> Rene that's a way better place to be than either pole. I'm afraid in this
> area of creative and commercial worth, as with the academic view of Heidegger
> you really have no idea what you are talking about.
> Then you may be interested in this exchange from another list?
> Jud [earlier]
> OK - it may make his thurifers and apologists squirm and engender
> guilt for their excuse-making - particular those in the academic
> Heidegger-industry who earn their bread on the back of this
> loathsome Nazi crank by pedalling his juvenile ideas.
Actually the people in the academic Heidegger industry are mostly on
> the attack, and it's become a gross affair. It reminds me of what
> Nietzsche said about reading into the Bible where every reference to
> a piece of wood is supposed to be a reference to the cross. Richard
> Wolin has now decided that as the embers of the Heidegger debate
> have cooled that he will go after Gadamer.
It what he says is true you may have missed the tide?
Jud Evans - ANALYTICAL INDICANT THEORY.
--- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/plain (text body -- kept)
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---