^ Architexturez Mail-Lists Home

 

FW: ANNOUNCEMENT

switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 11160…

 
+  From: "Bakker, R.B.M. de" <R.B.M.deBakker@xxxxxx>
+  Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 23:29:13 +0200
Folks,


Things here are now so, that the subject widerwille shall be radicalized
further. This might be offensive to your ears. Explicit language is warned for.
If all-important individuality - Zizeks 'interesting subjectivities' - is too
sensitive for more honesty, i advise friendly: stay away from it.
Widerwille is a widerwillig, vicious thing. If it is not faced, it blackens everything.

From the NT into the OT. Also: from the gods to the titans?
Kronos devours his children. What are the measures to measure
what is happening now?

Juenger, after ww2: we're no longer in world history (Later also Fukuyama,
but earlier: Nietzsche), but in earth history. Geschichte means here rather:
Geschicht: en ensemble of layers upon each other. Ge-stell, now that i think
of it. With a silent raging drive, that drives everything, Sounds eerie. it is. but
better get over that and find a way. History lies in shatters.

But i said: there is only now? Sure. Let me explain.

If you really think something, it cannot be forgotten. It will then come
back of its own. When you're worried. because you're always forgetting
things, and need remebering via books and lists, then there's still hope:
oblivion that has not been fully obliven. You'll have something to remember
now. Beginning is something very awkward. It lets widerwille not do, what it
always already wills: not show itself. But, what if its vanishing, its Entzug is
detected? Well than it appears in its all-envading power, but hardly
perceivable.(it's vanishing, remember?)

So, the proposition 'there is only now' - future only *will* be, past *has*
been - brought me back to something unforgotten. Un-forgotten: thought,
let go, and catched when coming back - Also forgotten therefore! But un-:
like a trail of pieces of bread. - 'Now' - writes the early Heidegger - is
mostly, but not exclusively, right. In 10 seconds it will be .... When is that
really? Is this ideal now reachable without past and future? No.
But we also say, now in the evening, also: now in the summer, even
now in this millenium. So presence is extendible, and also in that way never
without future and past. (Jud spoke here of rhythm!) As long as these simple
phenomena, Goethe's Urphaenomenen are not noticed, time gets heavier,
history crumbles. (big brush)
Tantalos is one of the early great, who dealt with endless time. Only after
the regime change of the gods, are they showed in captivity.


Remember Heidegger spoke of Eigensinn, self-sense, his own, later, in
Pinciple of reason, vis-a-vis Vom Wesen des Grundes? He admits a form
of widerwille. But only he is allowed to pass widerwille, and call it
Eigensinn, because here it concerns a self, an own (Eigen), that is sensed
sinnen, searching a way in the un-known (Er-eignis, en-owning).
This is difference! Flatly: turning shit into gold. This was for Nietzsche still
attainable: "the goldblinkering on the belly of the snake vita." (*including*
all uninvited explosions that he saw coming).But where he went, soon nobody
would be able to go, he wrote.

The only thing Heidegger has to offer is poverty, even less: only a preparing
for it. But poverty can receive, can be grateful. (contra: the ungrateful gender,
the spoiled pack-)
There's the Feldweg again: der Verzicht nimmt nicht, der Verzicht gibt, but
only to the possible grateful.
But also: you can't grab *your* favourites from what only Verzicht, Verhaltenheit gives.


rene















ÿÿÒ¶¸©2)?Yªç?xÿü «miÈfz{l­é¨½çÿÿôá?É?²Æ zf²?«Þr?íj)Þu«miÈfz{lÂ??«z·¦¢÷?ý*+¯/ðyÚ'¢Ö¥??¶Ö??g§¶Ê'¶¬?+-ÿÿÿJÚâ¤È¦y©¢»ÿþ?èqë,yÓ0JZ®Ûÿÿù®?Ø©j»j[^®v­?÷­{¦V¢?û^ÆÖèw/ÿ?êmþ×±·øm?_ÿÿÿÿ~º&?+-?è?z¯ùb²Ûÿ¾)ejÿ¾*à?x?ýçn

 
Previous by Thread: Announcement
Next by Thread: FW: ANNOUNCEMENT
 
Partial thread listing: