RE: more porn?

>
>    Heidegger's word can, however, like any other, be misused for spoiled
>    purposes. Let there be no misunderstanding how Heidegger thought of
>    killing and abuse.
>
>    regards
>    rene

rene,
    i was thinking in terms of jn caputo's thesis in "de-mything heid",
which i found convincing, ...don't see how you can ever prescind from the
factical without losing everything.  also, isn't tu quoque a specious
defense? ...as well for heid as anthony, each has to answer for his own
being.

bob


   Bob,
  
   The screwer and the screwed so close to each other?
   Caputo is a screwer too. He convinces you?
   All machination builds upon over- and underman. You want, like
   Caputo and Anthony, be superior?
   Or...do you really think 1968 is superior to 1933? 
   I cannot believe it.

   hopeful,
   rene
    
   
   
     





     --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---