+
From: Rene de Bakker <rbakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 17:34:43 +0200
At 21:13 6-9-99 +0200, Michael Eldred wrote:
>
>H. wrote _Sein und Zeit_ and
>characterizes it as the epoch coming after "Sein und logos" and "Sein
>und ratio".
>
>"The name 'time' in the title mentioned [SuZ], according to the clearly
>pronounced belonging to being, is the first name for the more originary
>essence of _altheia_ and names the essential ground for _ratio_ and all
>thinking and saying. 'Time' in 'Being and Time', as strange as it may
>sound, is the first name (Vorname) of the initial _ground_ of the word
>[= logos]. 'Being and Word', the
>beginning of the essential history of the occident, is experienced more
>incipiently." ("Parmenides" GA54:113)
>
>One of the more enigmatic passages, to my mind. The word is said to have
>an initial ground residing in time, which is the first name (provisional
>name?) of _altheia_. So there is a more originary experience of being
>than that opened up by the word?
Michael,
Don't think so. Being and word, both, in their mutual relation, are
experienced more incipiently. "Ground" doesn't indicate something else, but
the going deeper into the same. The context here is "lethe". On the next
page Hoelderlin is cited. His word is going deeper into the lethe.
But this makes it only more enigmatic.
greeting,
Rene
-----------------------------------
drs. René de Bakker
Universiteitsbibliotheek Amsterdam
Afdeling Catalogisering Faculteiten
tel. 020-5252368
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
