+
From: Christopher Stewart Morrissey <socrates@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 22:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
> So far as I know, Faulkner is right about Heidegger's not having
> examined Bacon's writings closely. Does anyone have any information to
> the contrary? And does anyone have any comments on Faulkner's criticism
> of Heidegger's diagnosis of the origins of modernity?
It's hard to see how Bacon's "self-conscious plan" presents any difficulty.
I suppose Heidegger would say: How could have Bacon conceived of his plan
if he hadn't already forgotten Being? Didn't his forgetfulness of Being
already make him "self-conscious"?
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
+ Previous by Thread:
Heidegger, Bacon, Science
+ Next by Thread:
Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science
Partial thread listing:
- Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science, (continued…)
- Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science,
Christopher Stewart Morrissey
- Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science,
Lois Shawver
- Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science,
Christopher Rickey
- Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science,
90DOSS
- Re: Heidegger, Bacon, Science,
90DOSS