+
From: "Anand Bhatt." <anand.bhatt@xxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:55:46 +0530
Architexturez. wrote:
In 1560 A.D. the infamous Tribunal of Inquisition was introduced which
brought along forced conversion and religious persecution of
non-Christians. But of the many changes this wrought, two were
particularly "volatile", Pandit observes; one was the emancipation of
women and the other the free transportation of architectural features
from religious buildings to houses.
er! has somebody read this book? what argumentational twists are
employed in this 'emancipation of women' stuff?
i thought it was more like this?
http://www.apol.net/dightonrock/inquisition_goa.htm
“......The inquisition, this tribunal of fire, thrown on the surface of
the globe for the scourge of humanity, this horrible institution, which
will eternally cover with shame its authors, fixed its brutal domicile
in the fertile plains of the Hindustan. On seeing the monster everyone
fled and disappeared, Moguls, Arabs, Persians, Armenians, and Jews. The
Indians even, more tolerant and pacific, were astounded to see the God
of Christianism more cruel than that of Mohammed, deserted the territory
of the Portuguese and went to the lands of the Muslims, with whom time
had made peaceful living possible, in spite of the fact that they
(Indians) had received from them enormous and incalculable evils. In
this fashion the fields and cities became deserted as are today Diu and
Goa“
Alexandre Herculano, a famous writer of the 19th century, mentioned in
his “Fragment about the Inquisition”: “...The terrors inflicted on
pregnant women made them abort....Neither the beauty or decorousness of
the flower of youth, nor the old age, so worthy of compassion in a
woman, exempted the weaker sex from the brutal ferocity of the supposed
defenders of the religion....”