south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] Re: SPA: School of Planning and Architecture (Alumni)

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 00712… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:29:25 +0530
| Anyone know why only Indian Express Delhi Edition
| continues to bring out Architecture stories?
| One is rather concerned about the singularity of
| this media situation; it is almost as if only one
| small group of informants is feeding the media.

http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=97426

SPA alumni assn contests ragging report
Express News Service

New Delhi, August 28: THE Alumni Association of the School of Planning & Architecture (SPA) sought to clear the air over the ragging controversy reported in the media this week. The association called a press conference on Saturday to clarify facts about the incident reported by a newspaper on August 26. According to them, the incident was misreported as sexually abusive ragging.

The SPA Student Council fully endorsed the clarification given by the Alumni Association.

‘‘The page one report, which stated that homosexuality and bestiality were part of the ragging on the SPA campus, was clearly a case of yellow journalism, as the report contained unverified and half-baked sensationalised information. We have managed a correct version as gathered from students of SPA. Three freshmen were asked to ‘enact’ an act of sexual passion and ‘mimic’ copulation with a dog. No actual stripping or physical act as stated in the report, was involved in the incident,’’ said Nikhil Segel, treasurer of the SPA executive committee.

He added that regardless of the fact that it was mimicry, the administration had taken a serious view of the incident one of the freshmen filed a complaint. The complainant had identified three seniors who were then suspended for three weeks and fined Rs 10,000 each. The anti-ragging faculty squad also identified 6 other senior students who were interacting ‘‘overzealously’’ with the freshers, and suspended them. The students’ body had called a one-day boycott of classes to protest these suspensions, but when apprised of the nature of the ragging, they too fully endorsed the punishment handed out to the senior students.

Meanwhile, the Human Resource Development Ministry ordered a re-investigation of the case and all the freshers in the institute—including the three who were ragged—were asked to give their versions in-camera. Those charged with ragging were also interrogated in-camera. The HRD enquiry report will be released soon.

Even as the alumni association apologised for the lack of interaction with the press after the incident, they demanded an unequivocal apology from the newspaper. ‘‘We demand an apology and clarification in the same space and of the same size as the report they carried,’’ said Vijay Garg, secretary, Alumni Association SPA.


Previous by Thread: SPA: School of Planning and Architecture (Gags and Ministers)
Next by Thread: Re: SPA Scandal: School of Planning and Architecture (Angst)
Partial thread listing: