south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] chief architects: Should we really have 'em? [ VN ]

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 01820… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:43:32 +0530
Do we really need a chief city architect?
17:06' 24/04/2006 (GMT+7)

The issue of whether or not a city should have a municipal chief architect was a heated topic in the recent discussion of the Decree on Urban Architectural Management. This article raises some of the opinions on the issue.

Vietnam has become rapidly urbanised. By February 2006, there were 684 towns and 34 cities nation wide. The process of urbanisation has brought with it both advantages and disadvantages.

There is a belief that unplanned towns and cities, in which there is often a mixture of architectural styles and a diversity of colours, results in the town or city becoming aesthetically displeasing.

Furthering the ugly appearance of many towns and cities are the electric wires hanging low on the streets and excessive advertising in public places.

The Ministry of Construction is calling for a decree on urban architectural management to govern the development in urban areas of Vietnam.

cont'd....
http://english.vietnamnet.vn/social/2006/04/563768/


Previous by Thread: Re: chief architects: Sofia, "I Will Not Retract Bill on Sofia Town Plan" (not really about vision) [ SAD! ]
Next by Thread: chief architects: Traditionalist As Chief Architect [ .us, Governmental architecture ]
Partial thread listing: