south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] Re: obit: Jane Jacobs v/s The Radiant City (beautiful) (!) [ Guaridan ]

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 01842… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 12:09:43 +0530
The Radiant City Beautiful conferred unprecedented power on the elites of the new welfare state, notably architects, developers and planners. They had money and a professional interest in new building. Governments could spend billions eradicating slums without noticing that they had been built for free and could be restored for free. Leave the city alone, cried Jacobs, or at least understand which bits worked and why. She accepted that neighbourhoods would gentrify, and un-gentrify, over time, and was relaxed about cars. They were an extension of home and work. Their excessive use in cities was because planners had destroyed mixed-use neighbourhoods and increased the need to travel (even more relevant in the internet age than when Jacobs wrote). Too much traffic was a sign of bad planning.

Jacobs's coup de theatre was to start her book not with what she called the "egotistical heroics" of architectural journalism but with an essay on The Uses of Sidewalks. Get sidewalks wrong, she said, and cities will go wrong, because the sidewalk is about security, the first requirement of any city. Sidewalks, properly respected, police themselves by being used and overlooked by doors and windows. They hold the key to the mixed-use neighbourhoods of which successful cities are composed. Death and Life ... must be the only book on architecture not to carry a single illustration. For illustration, said Jacobs, readers need only open their front doors.

On this simple insight Jacobs built her edifice. The classic Georgian grid of streets had never been bettered as an urban form. It offers ease of movement, wheeled or on foot, and embraces mixtures of activity, day and night, rich and poor, "sacred and profane". Let the local property market oversee its fluctuating fortunes. Destroy the street and ghettos form, social institutions collapse, areas "fail" and fall prey to architectural blitzkrieg. Large modern buildings, said Jacobs, were like chessmen. They move across the urban landscape either killing or being killed. Formal zones make the city rigid. They force residents to travel more than they need, imposing either congestion or blight and leaving vacuums for that urban curse, crime.

cont'd....
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1767897,00.html


Previous by Thread: obit: the Life of Jane Jacobs [ NYT ]
Next by Thread: obituary: Berlin: Josef Paul Kleihues
Partial thread listing: