south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] opinion: The amateur architect

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 01885… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:02:08 +0530
| Amateur architects are already banned in India,
| and with the watchdogs on urban aesthetics running unabated and
| the national design code right around the corner,
| picture this...

The amateur architect
by urban fox, times online correspondent
The Gherkin, part of Ken Livingstone’s attempt to reinvent the London skyline, is only one of many strange, adventurous and sometimes wonderful corporate and public buildings going up on all sides

.....
It was going to be a big project. We were excited. She was excited. The children chanted, “triangular prism! Triangular prism!” over the cornflakes.

Two months later, the architect called. She sounded a bit crestfallen. They’d said no, she said. No poncy glass bits were allowed in Camden. If we wanted a room in the roof, it was going to have to have a mansard roof. That was all they were going to approve anywhere for the foreseeable future. So did I want her to redraw it?

We tried again, with the mansard roof they wanted. All that was left of the original design was a big window in front, opening onto a midget terrace.

Six weeks later, we heard back again. But it was only computersaysnooo again. No terrace in front. Hadn’t we heard the first time? All they were approving at the moment was mansard roofs with two standard size windows in front and standard slate tiling on the sides. So – did we want to submit drawings that looked like that?

Well, I suppose we do. And I suppose we will. But It seems a waste of a lot of excitement, time and several thousand quid’s worth of architect’s fees, and I can’t help wishing they’d told us earlier that only one design was being approved all over Camden.
.....
cont'd....
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,18389-2198705,00.html


Previous by Thread: opinion: Should our cities be private or public spaces? (eh!)
Next by Thread: opinion: Was Prince Charles right? (kitsch nostalgia)
Partial thread listing: