south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] moscow: Cons: Architectural Preservation at Odds With Development [ Conference ]

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 01908… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:27:20 +0530
| neat article, discourse befitting an
| emerging or newly developing city...
| is russia now officially in the third world?

Building Moscow’s Future
By Paul Abelsky
Russia Profile

Architectural Preservation at Odds With Development

Few subjects of public debate cause as much hand-wringing and righteous indignation as the issue of architectural preservation. Moscow today faces the intractable problem of safeguarding its architectural past in the midst of an unprecedented construction boom, when evolving tastes, profit-driven projects and the insatiable demand for space are often at odds with the measured approach required for an effective and far-sighted preservationist policy.
....
A high-profile international conference called “Heritage at Risk” convened in Moscow at the end of April to outline strategies for preserving 20th-century architectural monuments at a time when the situation in Russia is reaching crisis proportions. ....

The conference was largely preoccupied with countering the notion that the general public is lukewarm toward the avant-garde projects of the early Soviet period. Experimental in spirit and devoid of ornate detailing, these buildings privileged the functional elements of design, defying the surroundings and repudiating what were judged to be outmoded architectural concepts. Constructivism, the movement that arose in the early 1920s and thrived until the ideological reversals of the Stalin era, is often considered to be Russia’s most lasting contribution to world architecture. Around 300 buildings went up in Moscow alone between 1925 and 1932, and as many as two thirds survive today. Only a few of these structures have the status of protected monuments, however. Even the iconic designs often languish in neglect and obscurity, subject to arbitrary conversions and ill-conceived repairs.

cont'd....
http://www.russiaprofile.org/culture/2006/6/6/3822.wbp


Previous by Thread: Mortgage: Construction experts fault system, offer new approaches [Nigeria]
Next by Thread: moscow property: Fomin Family, the architect of the Moscow metro
Partial thread listing: