+
From: "Architexturez." <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:51:30 +0530
London Sprawling
by Jonathan Bell
The British capital is never empty, and only major television events can
clear the streets. So why do movies and science fiction teem with vacant
blocks? Does urbanism have room for emptiness anymore?
London is never empty. Even the annual May Bank Holiday, when people
traditionally leave the city, shops shut, and the streets feel wide and
airy, is a disappointment for the claustrophobe. I’m hoping for a city
transformed from its usual schizophrenic self of snarling traffic,
angsty crowds, and small moments of rapture into an urban idyll of
broad, empty avenues and scattered lumps of lazy pedestrians. It doesn’t
happen. The dip in traffic levels is perceptible, but hardly remarkable,
and a few parking spaces have magically appeared where once there was
barely space to squeeze between fenders. But the city is far from vacant.
Abandoned urbanism is part fantasy, part nightmare: an impossible dream
that is now the preserve of advertising or cinema’s vision, dystopic or
nostalgic. Modernity has made it near-impossible to experience the city
as a truly empty space. Instead, we rely on false celluloid memories;
the Swinging Sixties, when David Hemmings could swing his black Rolls
Royce into any number of parking spots in the heart of fashionable
Knightsbridge, or the Beatles could saunter across Abbey Road without
having to keep a weather eye open for speeding cabs. Or the romantically
scuffed early-morning streetscape, when only stragglers and milk floats
are out and about, and our protagonist can saunter along litter-blown
streets.
cont'd....
http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/letters_from_london/london_sprawling.php