south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] Re: superStar hyperbole: OMA in Beijing (critique) [ .US ]

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 02363… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:10:22 +0530
| one more, ends in a quasi-pessimistic note again.
| is it that america is responding (finally) to Koolhaas'
| 'rejection' of America?

ref http://mail.architexturez.net/+/In-Enaction/archive/msg01472.shtml

Since the opening, Robertson and I have joked about "slacker details." This is a campus center, not a museum. If the details were too precise, you'd wind up with an uptight space. At Helmut Jahn's sleekly modern dorm next door, the students have taken to chalking the sterile concrete corridor walls with a rainbow of colors. They don't need to do that in the campus center. The messy vitality is built right in.

So is the wit. The center's iconic tube resembles a fallen tree trunk that crushed a one-story Miesian box.

The building's strengths have turned out to be conceptual as well as physical. Its design isn't based on structure, which was the Miesian way, but on human activity. It's "program-driven," as architects say.

The diagonal pathways slicing through the center couldn't be more different from conventional corridors. They open to activities around them, encouraging chance meetings, an essential byproduct of the density of urban life. Interior spaces like the food court are a pleasure to inhabit, endowed with a generosity of space and natural light even though they are below ground and crammed into the middle of this sprawling building.

It has been said that works of architecture ideally should be reviewed three times: first, when their design is unveiled; second, when they open; and third, after they've been in use for a few years. I praised the center's design after Koolhaas won the commission in a 1998 architecture competition, wasn't entirely happy when the finished building didn't uphold the Chicago tradition of transforming ideas into art, and am making my peace with the center now.

Bones outweigh blemishes. God should be in the details, yes, but it's just as important that She be in the grand design.


cont'd....
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/arts/chi-0611250235nov26,1,7116839.story?ctrack=1&cset=true


Previous by Thread: Re: superStar hyperbole: OMA in Beijing (critique) [ .US ]
Next by Thread: Re: superStar hyperbole: OMA in Beijing (critique) [ .US ]
Partial thread listing: