Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

[in-enaction] cons: Not all old buildings can be razed (Mumbai HC)


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 02407…

 
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:12:44 +0530
Not all old buildings can be razed to build multi-storeys, says HC

Only buildings declared dilapidated structures or financially not feasible for repairs by the state Housing Board can be demolished; no blanket bar on additional FSI under Section 33 (7) of DCR
Express News Service

Mumbai, December 11: The reconstruction of old buildings in the island city of Mumbai will now have to follow a set of stringent rules with the Bombay High Court on Monday stating that only buildings declared financially not feasible for repairs or dilapidated structures by the Housing Board can be knocked down and rebuilt into multi-storeys.

However, except some conditions, the high court has said there will be no bar on the additional Floor Space Index (FSI) granted to builders under Section 33 (7) of the Development Control Regulations.

cont'd....
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=212919

================================================

The PIL had been sent back to the high court from the Supreme Court after the Property Redevelopers Association and some tenants challenged an earlier high court order in the matter.

While disposing of the PIL in October 2005, the high court had set up three committees to verify the number of tenants eligible to be rehabilitated in a redevelopment scheme, check the structural stability of the building, and to take a re-look at conditions framed for DCR 33(7).

The court had further brought down the floor space index permitted on such plots from 7 to 4 to bear a rational relationship with the availability of civic amenities like water, sewerage and transport.

While removing this restriction (of using FSI of 4), the court on Monday ordered that all buildings taller than 24m (ground + seven storeys) in height would have to keep a compulsory open space of 3.6m as against 1.5m stipulated in the DCR.

Putting the safety of building occupants uppermost, the court held that reduced side spaces for reconstructed buildings were not reasonable as they left no space for fire-fighting and were violative of Article 14 of the Constitution (right to life).

cont'd....
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1068816


 
Previous by Thread: [in-enaction] cons: Not all old buildings can be razed (Mumbai HC)
Next by Thread: [in-enaction] cons online: Aalto's Woodberry Poetry Room
 
Partial thread listing: