Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

[in-enaction] regulators: Protecting the term 'architect' [ CA ]


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 02413…

 
+  From: aba-net <interface.public@xxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:55:48 +0530
Dear Editor:

As a practicing, licensed architect, and president of the California Architects Board, I read with interest the article about Jack Johnson and his use of the term architect in his run for the Aspen Council. While the court case evaluated that use in the context of free speech, it does not - and should not - change the latitude of the use of the term "architect" in the context of professional practice.

It seems to me that it is important to take the matter further, and to do so the following questions should be answered by Mr. Johnson and by your readers:

cont'd....
http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20061213/LETTER/112130033/-1/rss01

==================================================

WRT:

The California Architects Board (CAB) was created in 1901 by the California Legislature to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public through the regulation of the practice of architecture in California. It is one of numerous boards, bureaus, commissions, and committees within the Department of Consumer Affairs responsible for consumer protection and the regulation of licensed professionals. CAB establishes regulations for examination and licensing of the profession of architecture in California, which today numbers approximately 22,000 licensed architects and approximately 11,000 candidates who are in the process of meeting examination and licensure requirements.

Mission Statement

The mission of the CAB is to protect the public health, safety, and welfare through the regulation of the practice of architecture and landscape architecture in the state by:

• Ensuring that those entering the practice meet standards of competency by way of education, experience, and examination;
• Establishing standards of practice for those licensed to practice;
• Requiring that any person practicing or offering to practice architecture be licensed;
• Protecting consumers and users of architectural services;
• Enforcing the laws, codes, and standards governing architectural practice in a fair, expeditious, and uniform manner;
• Empowering consumers by providing information and educational materials to help them make informed decisions; and
• Overseeing the activities of the LATC to ensure it regulates the practice of landscape architecture in a manner which safeguards the well being of the public and the environment.

Source: http://www.cab.ca.gov/


 
Previous by Thread: [in-enaction] regulation: Tougher architect licensing law [ JP ]
Next by Thread: [in-enaction] Re: Improving Delhi urban transport through UniModal PRT technology
 
Partial thread listing: