Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

Re: [in-enaction] cons: The Rudolph house reprive


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 02457…

 
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:09:46 +0530
Architexturez. wrote:

Since a local Web site began spreading that news last month, a debate has erupted about the character of Westport and the future of the house, which is on sought-after Minute Man Hill Road.

cont'd....
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/nyregion/17house.html?ref=nyregion


Famed architect's work gets reprieve
From Times Wire Reports
December 25, 2006


A state judge has spared a Westport home, designed by renowned architect Paul Rudolph, from demolition — for now.

The 4,200-square-foot stucco house, designed by Rudolph in 1972, is an elongated series of interconnecting cubes with cantilevered panels that hang above large windows.

Rudolph, who died in 1997, was dean of the Yale School of Architecture in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation is fighting plans by the prospective owners of the home, who want to tear it down and rebuild. Another hearing is set for Jan. 2

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-briefs25.4dec25,1,2701013.story?coll=la-news-a_section

----------------------------------------

A Reprieve in Connecticut for a Modernist House

By DAVID HAY
Published: December 23, 2006
STAMFORD, Conn., Dec. 22 — A Connecticut judge on Friday ordered demolition halted on a Modernist house designed by a renowned architect, a project that has provoked a heated controversy in the wealthy town of Westport.

Janet Durrans for The New York Times

A historic preservation group hopes to save a 4,200-square-foot stucco house designed in 1972 by Paul Rudolph.

But the judge, Taggart D. Adams of State Superior Court, refused a request by a historic preservation group to order the owner of the house or its prospective buyer to cover the roof, which has been stripped of its tar covering, leaving the interior exposed. The group, the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation, had argued that with rain forecast over the weekend, the house could suffer “demolition by neglect.”

cont'd....
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/23/nyregion/23house.html

JPEG image

 
Previous by Thread: [in-enaction] cons: Raze the (Rudolph) house
Next by Thread: Re: [in-enaction] cons: Raze the (Rudolph) building; Get Piano (!)
 
Partial thread listing: