+
From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:12:18 +0530
| the Eminent Domain revisited.
Great Cities Need Great Builders
Architecture
By EDWARD GLAESER
Special to the Sun
January 19, 2007
Robert Moses still bestrides New York like a colossus. More than three
decades have passed since Jane Jacobs and Robert Caro tore down Moses's
once pristine public image, but his physical legacy remains standing.
Our New York is Moses's New York. He built 13 bridges, 416 miles of
parkways, 658 playgrounds, and 150,000 housing units, spending $150
billion in today's dollars. If you are riding the waves at Jones Beach
or watching the Mets at Shea Stadium or listening to "La Traviata" at
Lincoln Center or using the Triborough Bridge to get to the airport,
then you are in the New York that Moses built.
....
Moses's greatest failures were his housing projects. More than 40 years
ago, Jacobs attacked Moses for replacing well-functioning neighborhoods
with Le Corbusier-inspired towers. She was prescient. Moses spent
millions and evicted tens of thousands to create buildings that became
centers of crime, poverty, and despair.
A simple but stark lesson emerged from Moses's travails as housing tsar:
The government is not good at the housing business. New York is filled
with apartment buildings that provide decent housing and a comfortable
social environment for their residents. Almost none of them were built
by the government. New York has an affordable-housing problem, but it is
the result of government intervention in the housing market that has
limited housing supply. Rent control and an increasingly anti-growth
regulatory environment have ensured that new supply has not kept up with
the demand to live in reinvigorated New York. We need people with the
vision of Robert Moses building homes in New York, but they should come
from a private sector that is less fettered by government constraints.
Moses was at his best when he had to make sure his projects would fund
themselves or would really appeal to the people of New York. When Moses
acquired vast federal funding, he also acquired the freedom to pursue
his own vision, and that vision wasn't always in the interests of the
city. Mr. Bloomberg's plan for New York in 2030 needs its own Moses-like
master builders, but the city will be best served if those builders are
funded by and accountable to the city. Those builders must not be
beholden to every neighborhood group or cadre of unelected elites. While
Moses's successes would have been impossible under such conditions, his
failures could have been checked if he had faced a greater degree of
citywide oversight.
cont'd....
http://www.nysun.com/article/47012?page_no=1