south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] cons v|s sustainibility: and our bachlor in the midst!

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 02559… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:28:17 +0530
IT’S OUR HERITAGE, DON’T
PLAY WITH IT, MR PRESIDENT

A solar project at Rashtrapati Bhavan? No. Please

Patwant Singh

India’s 11th President, Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul Kalam, is a scientist of distinction whose immense contribution towards getting India recognised for its scientific achievements is widely acknowledged. Since a scientific mind calls for rational and clear-headed thinking it is difficult to understand his insistence on pushing through two schemes unworthy of him, his impressive qualifications, and his status.

SWHis proposal to use 20 acres in the President’s Estate to build one of Asia’s largest solar photovoltaic plants, in addition to a convention centre and an office complex is, to say the least, outrageous. The President’s House is a heritage site which he cannot trifle with. It belongs to the nation; and to India’s future generations. Not to someone who occupies it for a few years. No doubt it is reminiscent of British rule, but so also are many other priceless buildings. Even though they represent different periods of history when India was a vassal state, would disfiguring them help change our history?

People in the upper echelons of power need to be reminded of the interest even alien rulers took in the building of New Delhi. King George V while laying its foundation stone on December 15, 1911, said: “It is my desire that the planning and designing of the public buildings to be erected will be considered with the greatest deliberation and care, so that the new creation may be in every way worthy of this ancient and beautiful city.” He was not talking of a project in Britain, but in a distant colony. Yet he was deeply concerned. But we, who now have possession of our country and its incomparable heritage are destroying it piece-meal.

cont'd....
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main26.asp?filename=op021007Its_our.asp


Previous by Thread: at the head of table: our creative bachlor, items lying unattended (such as the SPA head, Delhi, in the basement)...
Next by Thread: Re: cons v|s sustainibility: and our bachlor in the midst!
Partial thread listing: