south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] Re: cons v|s sustainibility: and our bachlor in the midst!

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 02563… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:25:22 +0530
Architexturez. wrote:
IT’S OUR HERITAGE, DON’T
PLAY WITH IT, MR PRESIDENT

A solar project at Rashtrapati Bhavan? No. Please


Every detail of New Delhi’s planning, a city spread over 26 kilometres, was personally handled by Edwin L. Lutyens, who also designed the Viceroy’s House, now called Rashtrapati Bhavan. His painstaking efforts produced one of the world’s outstanding garden-cities with its refined emphasis on elegance and civic grace. Its greening reduced temperatures during the hot, dust-laden summer months of northern India; its green character was enhanced by placing bungalows in rolling lawns and gardens. Kalam’s insensitivity towards conserving Rashtrapati Bhavan’s historicity is also evident in many of these bungalows which are being degraded by ministers, members of parliament and senior officials who occupy them. Crude additions and alterations carried out without sanction show a contemptuous disregard for the conservation laws of this area. This disgraceful tendency of these government and political functionaries makes a mockery of civilised governance.

In the case of the solar project, the senior-most civil servant in the Union Ministry of Power, Secretary RV Shahi, says, “An architectural concept plan is being developed for the project with a view to integrate the design with the environmental and planning structures of the presidential estate.” How do you integrate an ungainly structure with a clutter of photovoltaic cells and much else on its roof, with an architectural tour de force like the President’s House? His meaningless statement is meant to bamboozle the public, as is his assertion that the project is “a vision statement about energy security and environmental responsibility”. If anything, it shows lack of vision, and a sense of irresponsibility. The Urban Arts Commission’s suggestions, he says, are also being sought. Having seen the decline of the Commission over the decades, it is no longer able to play an assertive role. The public must play that role by opposing the destruction of Delhi’s rich heritage.

The irretrievable damage to it is ongoing, as is also evident by the disregard of sane urban planning because of the Commonwealth Games 2010, which the Delhi government believes has given it the right to destroy Delhi’s historic environment. A vile project, known as the “nh24 — Lodhi Road Linkage”, will if executed adversely affect Humayun’s Tomb, the Nizamuddin Dargah, Lodhi Gardens, Safdarjung’s Tomb and several other lesser known structures on Lodhi Road. This is only the tip of the iceberg. Delhi’s new Master Plan, yet another disastrous proposal, if implemented, will also prove catastrophic to this city of ancient lineage. The Plan, instigated by people who understand political populism more than the continuity of cultures, conservation principles, and respect for a great heritage, will destroy whatever is left of it. The unholy nexus of greedy politicians, officials and developers will ensure that.

So wherein lies the hope? In the assertiveness of people who care. By raising their voices they can still stop the rot. If they don’t they will prove no different from those who have brought us to this pass.


cont'd....
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main26.asp?filename=op021007Its_our.asp

_______________________________________________
in-enaction mailing list
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/in-enaction Architexturez collaborative at http://portal.architexturez.org/



Previous by Thread: cons v|s sustainibility: and our bachlor in the midst!
Next by Thread: Book: Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology
Partial thread listing: