south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] Re: discussin: Presentation on a perspective plan forDelhi

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 02705… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:26:33 +0530
leon morenas wrote:
Is this panel discussion set up in the same vein as the earlier one was? [ http://www.niua.org/mpd/delhi_master_plan_2021.htm ]? Frankly, the powerpoint presentations for public dissemination that are available at the above url are insipid re-utterances that I have been hearing since my own engagement with Delhi and these presentations lack the sort of critical analysis especially about the politics of development in Delhi... For one, I am especially interested in how the hegemony of the Master Plan is being threatened by the USAID driven JNUURM?


Reiterating that the Master Plan notified on February 7 is going to create a mess in the city, Jagmohan said by legalising commercial establishments on 2,183 roads under the cover of mixed land use norms, the government was just adding to the chaos.

"Mixed land use should be allowed in an area as long as it is coincides with the original layout plan and the service plans of a colony. But the Master Plan legalises commercial establishments that came up due to abetment by the politicians. No one has bothered to check if infrastrucutre can actually be developed in these areas to serve the commercial requirements. This Plan will only lead to dishonest implementation,"Jagmohan said.

Dwelling on the problems that come in the way of planning, School of Planning and Architecture, Dean, KT Ravindran said, "The problem is not of multiplicity of authorities but that of each agency having different functions which do not coincide. Thus it is important to put in place a cohesive mechanism for planning and implementation of the same."

Architect and The Times of India columnist Sudhir Vohra too asserted that planning and governance has to converge somewhere to give Delhi a better future.

On the highlights of the Perspective Plan, Jagan Shah from NIUA said, "The Plan is an alternative Master Plan for the city which calls for a paradigm shift from looking at land use in isolation. Our Plan talks of integrated development of an area where land should be treated as a wholesome entity with infrastructure, facilities like transport and liveability accounted for."

cont'd....
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Delhi/Its_a_master_plan_for_chaos_Jagmohan/articleshow/1704247.cms


Previous by Thread: our bachlor: and 'architecture of inclusive growth'
Next by Thread: Perspective plan for Delhi: bye-bye Laws
Partial thread listing: