+
From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:14:22 +0530
The Feminist Future: Theory and Practice in the Visual Arts
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, USA
Kristin M. Jones
...............
For ‘Body/Sexuality/Identity’, Beatriz Colomina explored Le Corbusier’s
bizarre defacement of the Eileen Gray-designed villa E.1027, and Geeta
Kapur addressed the ‘reconstruction of identity through the attenuation
of identity’ in the work of Bombay artists Rumana Hussain and Navjot
Altaf. Marina Abramovic’s talk on her ‘Balkan Erotic Epic’ series was
fascinating, but there seemed to be a conflict when she denied being a
‘feminist artist’ while mocking the male audio-visual personnel. The
second day opened on a high note with Anne M. Wagner’s probing keynote
in which she described works by artists ranging from Henry Moore to Yto
Barrada as feminist, concluding, ‘the feminist imagination assumes many
faces’, and worried about injustices that women face outside academia
(her response to another talk’s gauzy optimism: ‘Nancy Pelosi as Speaker
is not a sufficient solution’). For ‘Writing the History of Feminism’,
David Joselit analysed works by Hannah Wilke and the Bernadette
Corporation to argue that images are trans-gendered.
Despite such intriguing positions, issues that dogged Feminism in past
decades remained vexing. ‘I feel like I’m gate-crashing a reunion’,
admitted Wangechi Mutu before delivering a presentation on her work for
the panel ‘Institutionalization of Feminism’, which concluded with a
list of other women of colour who might have been invited. (Organizer
Deborah Wye noted that one of the artists mentioned by Mutu was invited
but unable to attend.) The implications of this bastion of Modernism
playing host to such an event did not go unremarked. Helen Molesworth
imagined works by Joan Snyder, Dana Schutz, Amy Sillman and Cindy
Sherman hung together within its walls.
cont'd....
http://www.frieze.com/review_single.asp?r=2619