Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

Re: [in-enaction] budget 07/08: ...and the cities


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 02780…

 
+  From: "Architexturez." <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:21:20 +0530
Anand Bhatt wrote:
Just back from a longish briefing on the Budget

Om Prakash Mathur: The Budget and the cities

India plans to spend just 0.6% of GDP on its cities versus 3-5% in China

Om Prakash Mathur / New Delhi March 11, 2007


The week following the presentation of the Budget has occupied the country’s macro and fiscal economists into debating whether or not this Budget would help achieve the growth targets and objectives, bring the fiscal deficit to levels required under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act (FRBMA), improve the lives of the aam admi, and enable the country to swiftly integrate with the global economic system. With the din of the economists having subsided, let me draw the attention of the finance minister to at least one aspect whose centrality to the country’s growth trajectory seems to have been missed out in the budget-making exercise. This relates to cities and towns: how sensitive has this Budget been to the financial needs of cities and towns? Has the Budget made adequate provisions for them to be able to contribute to, let us say, the XIth Plan goals and objectives? Cities and towns hold 310 million people or 30 per cent of the country’s total population. About 75 million of them belong to the category of the poor (2004-05 estimates). Cities and towns are key generators of the net domestic product (NDP): the CSO estimates that in 1999-2000, cities and towns generated 51.7 per cent of the NDP, claiming a productivity advantage of 1.7:1 vis-à-vis the rural areas. They accounted for 56 per cent of the increase that took place in the NDP between 1993-94 and 1999-2000.
....
The Budget, of course, bears the assumption that fund allocation for JNNURM will leverage private capital — an estimated leveraging factor of one, apart from bringing in close-to-matching investments from states and cities. The Budget probably also assumes that there will be some off-Budget financing available for urban infrastructure from specialised financing institutions and a few enterprising urban local governments who may venture to expand their resource base by entering the debt market. All this would add up to an investment of approximately Rs 21,000-23,000 crore in 2007-08,

cont'd....
http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?autono=277282&leftnm=4&subLeft=0&chkFlg=


 
Previous by Thread: [in-enaction] budget 07/08: Issues about the profession?
Next by Thread: [in-enaction] Budget proposal for providing a legal framework for trading of securitized debt
 
Partial thread listing: