south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] demolish heritage: Shanghai residential areas (and weird cons claims)

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 03120… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:25:40 +0530
| now what we don't understand is the link between a city with
| old buildings and a city without. what does it means when they
| say "A city without cultural continuity is a city with no memory, no
| soul, nor vitality."? is this a coherent statement? or more of
| humane-sustainable slogan raising?

Old architecture lends soul to modern cities

MORE and more old residential buildings in Shanghai are being torn down to make way for new roads, metro lines or large high-rise residential and commercial compounds.

Indeed, many old properties have grown so dilapidated and outdated that they are no longer fit for habitation and preservation may be too costly.
....
It is one of the city's signature attractions but government endorsed the tearing down 52 hectares of old "shikumen" houses in the neighhood years ago. Eventually only four hectares were kept and incorporated into the new-look Xintiandi, he said.

Experts keep raising the call for more preservation, but will the city planners and public heed it? As Xue says: "A city without cultural continuity is a city with no memory, no soul, nor vitality."

cont'd....
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2007/200705/20070517/article_316111.htm

-----------------------------

| and some sustainable/con interview:

Hamburg is quite traditional in preserving its historical buildings and in forming a consistent townscape, thus obtaining and conserving a strong “hanseatic” identity. How do you see Shanghai’s identity given the rapid changes in its urban development and how can Shanghai keep its identity?

Shanghai’s identity has always been changing because it is a city that in its history has always been learning from other cities. The city has been forming and changing its identity for about 700 years, and concerning urban development we have two aims now: The first one is to preserve the historical buildings. In 2002 the municipality has announced a new legislation concerning that, and has also named 12 historical areas. In the last year we worked out a preservation program for those areas covering more than 27 square kilometers. Since the early 1990s altogether 632 buildings and blocks have been named heritage architecture and been given special signs. Apart from that we named 32 suburban historical areas. Because of Shanghai’s 6000 years of history there also are several relicts and historical buildings in suburban areas. So all in all, Shanghai is now executing the most strict preservation program in its history. The second aim of Shanghai’s urban development is to be back among the world’s major cities again. In its history Shanghai has already had the status of a world city, which was in the 1920s and 1930s. But since that Shanghai has been isolated from the outside world for a long time. Now we want to take the opportunity and the current advantage to develop Shanghai into a world metropolis again.

cont'd....
http://www.green-shanghai.com/eng/newsletter/june06/zhengshilinginterview_article.html


Previous by Thread: demolish heritage: Cons raze Ranjit Singh's Baradari (!)
Next by Thread: Re: demolish heritage: Shanghai residential areas (and weird cons claims)
Partial thread listing: