south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] Planners and their "upstream" aesthetics: The Thames Gateway

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 03217… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:27:19 +0530
Sold down the river


The Thames Gateway is a place of rich history and eerie beauty. But 120,000 homes are being plonked down on it as if it were a cultureless wasteland, says Tristram Hunt

Monday June 18, 2007
The Guardian


A journey east along the A13 is not an uplifting experience. Passing outer London's lorry depots, storage units, and defunct factories, all the detritus of late-20th-century, post-industrial urban life is laid before you. The vast carcass of Dagenham's mothballed Ford motor plant is a particularly sorry sight.
But once you skirt the retail jungle of Lakeside Thurrock, a sharp turn south brings you to a hidden gem of English history. Marooned between a power station and cruise terminal, Tilbury Fort is an icon of our island story. First laid out by Henry VIII and then redesigned by Charles II (in whose honour the sumptuous Water Gate entry was designed), this is the spot where Elizabeth I rallied her troops to resist the Spanish Armada in 1588...

And what a past it is. The bones of monkeys, bears, elephants and hippopotamuses have been found on Mersea Island. There are Roman earthenware pots, Romano-British burial chambers, and evidence of the Viking raids along the Essex coast.
....
Last year, in a lecture at the Museum of Docklands, the historian Patrick Wright noted how the Thames's "upstream admirers", so inspired by Eton, Cliveden, Westminster and Greenwich, are filled with unease at the thought of what lies downstream. "Glancing east, in the direction of the estuary, the upstream chroniclers see profuse indications of working-class labour and habitation. Beyond the sprawl, they sense an unvisited world of malarial marshes and industrial debris: a place of ruined explosive factories, isolation hospitals, prisons, oil refineries and rubbish dumps; and a notable absence of good manners, prosperity and aesthetics too ...

"Since it fails to conform to upstream ideas of natural beauty and architectural significance," Wright continued, "the entire area can easily be mistaken for wasteland - a vast 'brownfield' site, in which any form of development can only be counted an improvement."

What both the helicopter and the upstream tendencies ignore, of course, is the voracious heritage that lingers east of the Royal Observatory. If the Gateway development is going to be a success, the planners need to get out of their helicopters and embrace, rather than obliterate, it.



cont'd....
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/heritage/story/0,,2105571,00.html




Previous by Thread: Planners (and their 'upmarket aesthetics'): vote to demolish Pimlico School
Next by Thread: Re: Planners and their "upstream" aesthetics: The Thames Gateway
Partial thread listing: