Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

[in-enaction] JJ v|s NATA? 'We will not take cognisance of council letter’ (Maharastra)


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 03252…

 
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:11:06 +0530
| More controversy about NATA, citing in full. especially
| see the litigation trail (msg03181.shtml on Enaction-L)
| should anyone care to get official statements from the two sides?

ref: http://mail.architexturez.net/+/In-Enaction/archive/msg03181.shtml
ref: http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=244658

STUDENTS SEEKING ADMISSION TO J J COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE & FOUR OTHERS WILL NOT SUFFER, ASSURES STATE

‘We will not take cognisance of council letter’

Mihika Basu

Mumbai, July 06: FOR once, a tough stand taken by the state government against the Council of Architecture (CoA) will come as a breather to aspiring students of architecture.

A day after Newsline reported that the CoA in a notification dated June 28 had frozen the intake (read admissions) at prestigious city institutes like J J College of Architecture in Mumbai and Rachna Sansad Academy of Architecture, Additional Chief Secretary (higher and technical education), Joyce Shankaran, categorically said “we will not take cognisance of the notice issued by the council”.

“The state-government’s common entrance test (CET) has kickstarted the admission process and there’s no looking back,” added Shankaran.

The other institutes where intake has been frozen by CoA include BKPS College of Architecture and Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Architecture in Pune, and VNIT in Nagpur.

CoA president Vijay Sohoni said: “Other states have gone for NATA (National Aptitude Test in Architecture), so why can’t Maharashtra? Their CET is not acceptable to us.”

The dispute started several months ago when the state government refused to accept NATA at government and government-aided colleges for admissions to Bachelor of Architecture (BArch), which was made mandatory by CoA from 2007 onwards.

This was followed by a Ministry of Human Resource and Development (MHRD) letter which said that “making it (NATA) compulsory for all architecture institutes in India is illegal”.

The results for the common entrance test taken by around 970 students, including approximately 400 in and around Mumbai and Pune, will be declared on July 9.

The test was conducted at three government-aided colleges and nine (affiliated) unaided colleges in the state.

Further, even as the state government is planning to write a letter to the MHRD to “settle the issue finally”, Shankaran emphasised that there’s “no urgency at all and we’ve already said that admissions will also go on as per schedule”.

“By the time the students complete their architecture course, MHRD will come out with some solution. In any case, they won’t suffer,” she added.

Meanwhile, the state government has found an ally in the Indian Institute of Technology-Kharagpur which admitted students in its architecture courses through an entrance exam not “approved by CoA”.

In a public notification on July 6, IIT-Kharagpur has said that as per the MHRD notification, “CoA cannot make NATA essential for either admission to architecture courses or mandatory for issue of registration”.




 
Previous by Thread: [in-enaction] (aside) NATA? What? When? How?, and AICTE
Next by Thread: [in-enaction] Universities v|s NATA: 'We will not take cognizance of CoA' (Attrition)
 
Partial thread listing: