south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] PRBoA: "Architectonic debate" [PH]

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 03316… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:07:03 +0530
"It's called solicitation-once you project yourself as an architect or offer yourself as capable of performing the work of an architect," Alli explains. "Such a practice is prohibited under the law."

Apart from giving media practitioners reason to pause and verify their sources' claims, the issue is bigger than it seems since it also concerns would-be Filipino architects studying abroad, as well as foreign architects hired by prominent families and multinational companies to do a number of projects here either as consultants or "architects-of-record."

How does the board deal with such individuals and situations without appearing biased against, say, Calma, who, apart from having the advantage of working for one of the country's best architectural firms, also studied architecture abroad?

What does it take to be able to legally practice architecture in the Philippines? Won't education in the best schools abroad as well as an impressive body of work suffice, or make up for a person's inability to take the board exam here?

cont'd....
http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/lifestyle/lifestyle/view_article.php?article_id=80647


Previous by Thread: pr: Beyond 2006: The Global Summit for Creative Industries
Next by Thread: USA: Dead architect's rival sues over licensing (!)
Partial thread listing: