Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

[in-enaction] essay: how architects cope with rejection.


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 03334…

 
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:24:41 +0530
you can't win them all
how architects cope with rejection.


Source: residential architect Magazine
Publication date: July 1, 2007


By Cheryl Weber

Edward Hodges, AIA, a principal at DiMella Shaffer in Boston, recalls his firm's recent unsuccessful bid for work on a college residence hall. During the interview the architects had made a joke about something, and whether or not it tipped the scale, they later heard that the selection committee didn't think the architects knew them well enough to joke around. “I'm a pretty relaxed guy and always thought humor was good,” Hodges says. “If that didn't seem right to them, then maybe we weren't a good fit.”

Equally confounding was New York City architect Frances Halsband's experience interviewing for a dormitory project years ago at an Ivy League university. She got the job and later became friends with a member of the review panel. When she asked why her firm was chosen, he replied, only half-jokingly, that he didn't know anything about architecture; he just picked the guy with the nicest tie. “Talk about not taking it personally,” says Halsband, FAIA, a partner in R.M. Kliment & Frances Halsband Architects. “We've got a partner with a really nice tie, we've got an asset.”

Rejection—whether personal or professional—is painful, and for architects it's par for the course. In the human drama that accompanies the interview process, everything is up for grabs, from political savvy and presentation skills to the cut of a suit. When you're competing against like-minded peers, the underlying reason for the turndown may be elusive or, like the tie incident, totally subjective. Or it may be crystal clear: Your firm isn't big enough, it lacks experience in a given project type, or there's a mismatch of ideas or personalities. While young architects feel the pain the most, those who've lived through a spate of rejections have learned to move on with grace, good humor, and often, relief.

cont'd....
http://www.architectmagazine.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=1013&articleID=538135&artnum=1


 
Previous by Thread: Re: [in-enaction] essay competition: SENSE OF PLACE The Indian Subcontinent - 2004
Next by Thread: [in-enaction] essay: Innovate or Perish - New Technologies and Architecture's Future
 
Partial thread listing: