Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

[in-enaction] sustainable architecture: too intensive (led the Khmer to ruin)


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 03337…

 
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:37:29 +0530
Angkor was a city ahead of its time
The technology for harvesting water that enabled the Khmer to thrive also led to their fall, researchers say.
By Thomas H. Maugh II, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 14, 2007

....

The system was complex enough that the Khmer could have grown rice throughout the year and not just during the rainy season, Evans said. It is not yet clear if they did so, however.

"The intentional movement of earth to create the whole water system is just really mind-boggling," Saturno said. "It was an enormous undertaking" that required not just administrative skills, but also engineering know-how and massive amounts of physical labor.

But in the end, maintenance became too labor-intensive, Evans said. As trees were removed from the landscape, sediment began accumulating in the canals at a rate more rapid than it could be removed. Many dike walls collapsed, although it is not yet known when that occurred.

"We're going now and excavating [the sites] on the ground, and trying to get a grip on when they happened -- whether they were a precursor of the decline, a symptom or the system gradually falling into ruin after they left," he said.

cont'd....
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-angkor14aug14,1,2238688.story?coll=la-news-science&ctrack=1&cset=true


 
Previous by Thread: [in-enaction] Sustainable Architecture: more dubious propositions (Brown Towns)
Next by Thread: Re: [in-enaction] sustainable architecture: too intensive (images)
 
Partial thread listing: