Architexturez > E-Mail Lists > [ In-Enaction ]
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
(semi) moderated, opt-in discussion list closely co-ordinated with Architexturez South Asia.
 

Re: [in-enaction] sustainable architecture: too intensive (suss dreams of a big one)


List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 03350…

 
+  From: Architexturez <interface.services@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:04:24 +0530
| and this revelation comes after nearly a century
| of humane-sustainable types reviling New York
| (and did they also not advocate cars in that city
| on some horse-manure grounds?)

In terms of per capita consumption, New York is much greener than Hastings. Although the Big Apple didn't make Yahoo!'s list, it is in fact more energy efficient per person than any other American city—and even many states. The reason is density; more people per square foot equals lower average waste. Carbon emissions in NYC are less than a third of the national average, and typical electricity use is 75 percent lower than in Dallas. Because walking and public transit are popular, gasoline consumption approximates U.S. levels from the 1920s. When it comes to saving the planet, it doesn't take a village—it takes a metropolis.


cont'd....
http://www.architectmagazine.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=1006&articleID=549698


 
Previous by Thread: Re: [in-enaction] sustainable architecture: too intensive (images)
Next by Thread: [in-enaction] sustainable gated communities: Putting life back into the earth
 
Partial thread listing: