south.asia (home) | sub.gate | collaborative(s) | mail.lists | about | search - 
 
 
List co-ordinated with... AZ: Glossolalia, "speaking in tongues"...
Architexturez > Mail > [ In-Enaction ] debate: Can Robson be Bawa’s sole defender?

List Information Page (subscribe to this list here) + … search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 03761… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index +… ^ thread index +… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: Architexturez-IN <admin-in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:22:25 +0530
Architexturez. wrote:
http://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2004/2/1/features/7202834&sec=features

Understanding GB

By Johnni Wong
DAVID Robson's book, Bawa, sub-titled geoffrey bawa: the complete works,
published in 2002, is a highly readable and illuminating work on the late
Sri Lankan architect.

ref: http://mail.architexturez.net/+/In-Enaction/archive/msg00410.shtml
ref: http://mail.architexturez.net/+/In-Enaction/archive/msg00409.shtml

Robson: Can Robson be Bawa’s sole defender?
In his latest book on Geoffrey Bawa, David Robson takes issue with aspects of Sri Lankan architectural historian Shanti Jayewardene's writings on Bawa. She seeks to place his work in a more academic context.
.....
Undeniably, Robson’s architectural biography covers the wider sources that inspired Bawa and usefully embellishes and updates the archive. His declared aim in writing the 2002 book was to ‘shed more light on Bawa’s complex personality…’, (2002, p. 12). It suggests a method that uses architecture to explain personality reversing the more familiar (if old-fashioned) architect as ‘hero’ mode of descriptive critical writing underpinned by a belief that a study of the architect’s mind helps understand his work. He provides little other information on his theoretical approach or methods. Perhaps coincidentally the framework and chronological ordering of Robson’s first book, very different from the disjointed later one, and his historical and architectural analyses (and illustrations) resonate with the dissertation. In the 1970s, Bawa rarely mentioned his design sources. The research sought to unveil the sources of the Sri Lankan traditions emerging in Bawa’s designs. I cite below a few instances where Robson once again perhaps unwittingly shares my research although his writing post-dates mine by 18 or more years.

cont'd....
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080302/Plus/plus000017.html
==================================================================
Robson: Jayewardene questions my status as a self-styled ‘authority on Geoffrey Bawa’ and expert on the architecture of Monsoon Asia, and I have to agree that I do seem to have been guilty of unpardonable hubris. All I can say in my defence is that I am a victim of the blurb which publishers add to the dust jackets of books. Even the titles of my books cause me to squirm in embarrassment: the sub-titles “Complete Works” and “Masterworks of Monsoon Asia” were added without my approval.

In her Sunday Times article she refers to the fact that in the post-independence era the architectural profession and first school of architecture were affiliated to British establishments and is implicitly critical of my role as a ‘novice graduate’ teacher in the Colombo School of Architecture in the early 1970s. She then goes on to question my qualifications as a non-Sri Lankan to write about a Sri Lankan architect and seeks to discourage me from writing further books. This is not the first time that I have had to field such criticisms though I find it sad when they emanate from a fellow academic, particularly a Sri Lankan who has chosen to live in Britain and has studied in British institutions. I wonder how she would react if, in similar vein, I were to question her qualification to publish her recent study of the British-period architecture of South India? Of course it is important that anyone reading my books should be aware of my background and should take that into account: what I have written reflects who I am, and any other writer would have written it differently. In writing the Bawa book I did something which nobody else, including her, seemed interested or willing to do at the time, but my book in no way precludes other writers from tackling the subject.

If nothing else, my book will hopefully serve as a source for future writers whose ambition is to write in more scholarly and discursive fashion. Jayewardene now hints that she is planning to write a critical appraisal of Bawa’s work. Ten years have passed since he suffered the final stroke which ended his career and five years since he died: this would be a good time for such an undertaking and I wish her well with it. Indeed C. Anjalendran and I would be very happy to put our not inconsiderable archives at her disposal and help her in any way we can.

cont'd....
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080316/Plus/plus000017.html

Previous by Thread: pub: bawa: Understanding GB (review)
Next by Thread: pub: Guide to the Architecture of India
Partial thread listing: