A MPD2021 draft objections / suggestions blog is
online.
(Gawd not another one... )
Its a little raw at present, but sign up and start
bashing away as a TEAM member. OR just post your
comments to individual posts on the blog.
The blog is at:-
http://mpd2021.blogspot.com/
Sarbajit Roy.
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In case anyone else was wondering what happened to
> the
> anti-Plan munch in Delhi, here:
>
http://www.hindu.com/2005/06/02/stories/2005060217500300.htm
>
http://www.hindu.com/2005/06/03/stories/2005060311340300.htm
> [nice to see they are using phrases like
> citizens-groups and engaging via Public Notice. hope
> they also find themselves someone qualified to read
> DMP-2001 and DMP-2021 and spot the big differences,
> many of which they have been advocating/endorsing]
>
> pioneer series of 8 by 3 is also done. all at:
>
http://www.ufionline.org/frontpage_debate.htm
>
> then there are expert-groups that came out of DUAC
> and
> ITPI meetings last month, including people named as
> authors in DMP-2021, also alt-Plan making.
>
> and standing committee hearing on 30/05 also had
> similar experts with well known anti-Plan/DDA alt
> visions about which they might opine via public
> notice
>
> ---
>
> so much ctrld-alt[Plan]-delete[DMP/DDA] around
> humble
> Public Notice (that none with clout touched from
> S'garhi on ridge to ITPark on river) is flummoxing.
>
> ---
>
> further-flummoxing is latest reply-affidavit sworn
> by
> DDA VC that goes step beyond usual stout insistence
> of
> authorities-NOT-violating and
> petitioners-NOT-in-public-interest to say mpisg
> petition, as matter of fact, hinders the interest of
> public at large.
>
> we are delighted our court cases against DMP
> violations are factually hindering! obviously,
> deponent (like his predecessor who once swore we are
> not covered by his authority's public-interest
> mandate) has not noticed we a-r-e public-at-large,
> with private interest in public interest (as
> astutely
> sighted by senior senor who said IT Park case, not
> filed in public-interest about which we have become
> frightfully foncused, attempts to agitate that under
> garb of pvt interest).
>
> fully flummoxing public-private business now makes
> us
> wonder:
> !maybe DMP2021 public notice is in-bhagidaari!
>
> not being bhagidaars saying aye or not saying nay to
> WB-GNCTD-MoEF DUEIPP ideas (become 1999 DMP2021
> recos
> become 2003 DMP2021 guidelines become 2005
> draft-DMP2021 and including also management ideas
> like
> local-area-plans, etc, that MCD byelaw-reform is
> hawking as fresh-thunk-originals) nor wanting to
> become intermediaries as per those ideas, whatever
> public as-matter-of-fact-hindering-interest-etc says
> via public notice is certain to be rejected in
> award-winning bhagidaari (witness fate of our
> engaging
> on 2 doz public-notices from s'garhi to ITpark and
> beyond).
>
> btw, Pioneer reported on 04/06 "Bhagidari has won
> the
> United Nations (UN) Public Service Award 2005 for
> improving transparency, accountability and
> responsiveness in public service". hallelujah.
>
> so.
> like PM lately said, think out-of-the-box.
> inviting, then, o-o-t-b thunks.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Discover Yahoo!
> Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and
> more. Check it out!
>
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/