+
From: "gita" <plan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:37:20 -0500 (CDT)
legality of MPD-2021 has to be scrutinized with reference to the statutory
provisions that applied to MPD-2001 revision. legitimacy of those
provisions is a separate and larger question of considerable topical
interest and was not the one I meant when I said that the (limited and
rather stodgy) legality question seems to interest no one.
- gita
Architexturez wrote:
...
> The legality of MPD-2021 interests us immensely, in the context of the
> regularizations of 1957 and since which leaves us wondering as to the
> exact instrumentalities of bye-laws, buy-laws, bye-bye-laws and other
> mechanisms evident since the beginning of DMC and DDA and DMP and MPD.
> Especially interesting are demolitions or pay-for-non-demolition rules,
> and historical precursors of the DDA which forever mixed-up law and
> commerce so we shall call them mixed-citizens-rights, standing and
> squatting committees, and profiteering in the name of improvements.
> anyone remember charliegunj went to become paharganj?
>
>
>>
>> ARE DUAC'S ACTIVITIES ON MPD-2021 LEGAL? This question ought to be
>> answered in context of the question of legality of MPD-2021 itself,
>> which
>> is complex and appears not to be of interest to anyone.
...