[eebill] FW: Education Bill 2004

Gita Dewan Verma purplepapaya36 at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 5 11:03:15 CDT 2004


huh? has UPA govt made draft Bill? or are states to model Bills on NDA draft 
Bill? Delhi govt anyway is pursuing NDA Bill in illusory compliance of court 
order for 25% free seats for EWS with admin order for 20% for BPL, with 
further drift from common school system law (Master Plan / DD Act), not 
Bill, is happening in another PIL to define duly defined neighbourhood 
school ab initio. And now this ... at-sea-in-bonhomie-of-bhagidari.
Anyone knows more about this latest law-making in Ms Dikshit's inimitable 
consultative style? (notice their last - cooperative Bill - blowing into 
scam?) I can't even make out if they are wanting to make state law or 
central law with Model Delhi Bill.
(i am forwarding this to two lists, so a few might have double trouble 
deleting it).


>From: "Ashok" <socialjur at mantraonline.com>
>Subject: Education Bill 2004
>Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:28:31 +0530
>
>
>
>New Delhi (India)
>
>                                                                            
>            05.08.2004
>
>
>
>Dear friend,
>
>
>
>
>
>Your are aware that the Ministry of Human Resource and Development, 
>Government of India has prepared a draft of the legislation envisaged in 
>Article 21A of the Constitution of India; viz. The Free and Compulsory 
>Education for Children Bill, 2004 and has invited comments from the State 
>Governments and the public on the same.
>
>
>
>In order to deliberate upon the implication of the Bill on the children of 
>Delhi, Government of Delhi held a day long consultative meeting on Saturday 
>31st July, 2004 at Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate, New Delhi which was 
>presided over by The Chief Minister of Delhi, Smt. Sheila Dikshit.  I was 
>one of the participants in the said meeting.  The Hon'ble Chief Minister 
>had taken keen interest in the deliberations and it was decided that since 
>the matter was complicated one, a small committee to go into the entire 
>matter and to prepare a report would be constituted. Next meeting is likely 
>to be held soon.
>
>
>
>In my presentation, I submitted that lot of things have been said against 
>the draft Bill by several eminent persons in the past.  I had also written 
>an article on the draft Bill demanding reframing of a Bill with child 
>friendly face. A copy of the article was given to the Director of Education 
>for circulation amongst the participants. I submitted that I would like to 
>point out certain positive things that in my opinion are required to be 
>considered while redrafting the Bill or preparing suggestions by the 
>Government of Delhi.
>
>
>
>I would like to share with you some of the following points raised by me 
>during the consultative meeting: -
>
>
>
>(1)       The Bill should deal with the problems of Delhi, such as, (i) 
>coordination between different agencies like local bodies and the 
>government engaged in education (ii) Administrative Control.
>
>
>
>(2)       The States have to play the greater role and therefore, (i) 
>Central Legislation should be a skeleton legislation as recommended by the 
>Parliamentary Standing Committee in November 1997 (ii) The States should be 
>left free to legislate their own laws dealing with the problems of their 
>respective States (iii) Model State Legislation could be incorporated in 
>the Central law which will be remain in force till States legislate their 
>own laws.
>
>(3)   The Social Jurist Teem had prepared a skeleton Model Delhi State 
>Legislation  which was read out in the meeting. The participants 
>appreciated the efforts of the Social Jurist Team and it was decided that 
>the Delhi Govt. would take it into consideration while preparing the draft 
>suggestions.  A copy of the same is attached hereto in your consideration. 
>This draft is a small effort and lot of more has to be done.
>
>
>
>(4)       During the consultative meeting, I also brought to the notice of 
>the Chief Minister that even if a good law is legislated, it will not work 
>unless the government officials responsible to implement the same are 
>serious to make it reality.  I pointed out several instances where 
>admissions are denied to the children by the government schools and the 
>complaints when brought to the notice up to the level of the Director of 
>Education remained un-redressed. Therefore, the government machinery has to 
>be made sensitive to the issue of education. I pointed out that the 
>government schools harass the parents and the children in the matter of 
>admissions in the schools.
>
>
>
>I would like to have your reaction and suggestions in the matter. We should 
>make our joint efforts to get a good, meaningful and workable Central 
>Legislation. The Central Government is in hurry to bring the Legislation. 
>Therefore, this is the time we need work to intervene both at States and 
>the Central levels.
>
>
>
>With regards
>
>
>
>ASHOK AGARWAL
>
>ADVOCATE
>
>Mobile: 9811101923
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Cricket maniacs ahoy! CDs, books, and more goodies! 
http://www.msn.co.in/Shopping/CricketShop/ Available at the cricket shop!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Model Draft Bill for Delhi.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 50688 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/eebill/attachments/20040805/317b678b/ModelDraftBillforDelhi.doc


More information about the eebill mailing list